Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.19 seconds)
Sanjay Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Others on 21 March, 2025 cites

Kuldeep Singh vs State Of Haryana on 8 February, 1996

2.1. The petitioners approached this Court by filing CWP No.20869 of 2012 titled Kuldeep Singh v. State of Haryana and others, decided on 27.07.2022, along with a batch of petitions with lead case CWP No.17432 of 2012. A plea was taken that as the petitioners had experience of teaching Classes IX and X, which were taught by PGT teachers, they should be considered eligible for grant of exemption from HTET. Since the plea had been raised before the Court for the first time, the petition was disposed of with the following observations:
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 426 - B N Kirpal - Full Document

Purnendu Mukhopadhyay And Others vs V.K. Kapoor And Another on 12 October, 2007

7. Further, the judgment relied upon by Mr. Nehra in Purnendu Mukhopadhyay case (supra) has no application to the facts of the instant case since in that matter the Supreme Court has held that once the Court has granted a relief, it cannot be refused to the similarly placed persons. The petitioners herein are not similarly situated to the candidates who were granted the relief vide judgment dated 07.08.2024, as they themselves never agitated the right to claim the said relief at the first instance; secondly, there are no posts available against which their candidature can be considered. Still further, the petitioners are mere fence-sitters and have approached the Court after considerable delay without any plausible explanation. They cannot claim the relief given in cases of other candidates who agitated their rights and knocked the doors of this Court at appropriate stage.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 28 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Prem Parkash And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Others on 24 November, 2022

Common questions of law on similar facts arise in all these petitions, and the same are therefore being decided together by this order. For brevity, the facts are being taken from CWP No.5002 of 2025, which has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the post of PGT Hindi in view of directions issued by this Court vide judgment dated 07.08.2024, rendered in a batch of petitions with lead case CWP No.8117 of 2023 titled Prem Parkash and others v. State of Haryana and others.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - H S Sethi - Full Document
1