Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (4.87 seconds)Section 149 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Myakala Dharmarajam vs The State Of Telangana on 7 January, 2020
Further, note was taken of the decision in Mykala Dharmarajam
Vs. The State of Telangana, [2020 (2) SCC 743], wherein it has been
(7)
::: Uploaded on - 27/01/2022 ::: Downloaded on - 28/01/2022 11:18:10 :::
acb-110-20, 111-20, 112-20.odt
observed :-
Hariram Bhambhi vs Satyanarayan on 29 October, 2021
Similar view was taken in Hariram Bhambhi Vs. Satyanarayan
and Another, [2021 SCC Online SC 1010] and Bhoopendra Singh Vs.
State of Rajasthan and Another, [2021 SCC Online SC 1020].
Manoj Kumar Khokhar vs The State Of Rajasthan on 11 January, 2022
Following observations in Brijmani Devi Vs.
Pappu Kumar and Anr., Criminal Appeal No.1663 of 2021 disposed of on
(13)
::: Uploaded on - 27/01/2022 ::: Downloaded on - 28/01/2022 11:18:10 :::
acb-110-20, 111-20, 112-20.odt
17.12.2021 by the three judge Bench of the Hon'ble Apex Court have
been reiterated in Manoj Kumar Khokar (Supra), which are thus :-
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav & Anr on 18 January, 2005
In
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar Vs. Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav and Anr.,
[(2004) 7 SCC 528], the Apex Court has held that "although it is
established that a court considering a bail application cannot undertake
a detailed examination of evidence and an elaborate discussion on the
merits of the case, the court is required to indicate the prima facie
reasons justifying the grant of bail." Further, in catena of judgments, the
Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that there cannot be a grant of bail in
mechanical way.
M/S Kranti Asso. Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs Masood Ahmed Khan & Ors on 8 September, 2010
Further, the relevant principles laid down in Kranti Associates
Private Limited & Anr. Vs. Masood Ahmed Khan & Ors. [(2010) 9 SCC
496] quoted thus :-