Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (1.05 seconds)

Nasir Ahmad And Ors. vs King-Emperor on 12 May, 1927

16. Hence, the respondents may consider the promotion of the applicants and others with reference to their eligibility dated 01.01.2021 in the light of the above Hon'ble Apex Court judgement. And if the department would like to go ahead with the implementation of their policy intention as stated in the document dated 05.08.2021, as any variation in the conditions of service of public post by mere executive order was not permissible, as the applicants would be deprived of the opportunity of filing objection to it if they so desire. It is made amply clear that to pursue further with the said decision, the respondents authorities must go ahead with the rule making process and power of the Government; where opportunity will accrue to the applicants for filing the objections at an appropriate time after the draft rules are notified. And only after the rules are finalized they will become actionable.
Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 629 - Full Document

Union Of India vs Manpreet Singh Poonam on 8 March, 2022

17. Further, we would like to add that no one has a right to promotion but time and again Apex Court has ruled in umpteen number of cases that every employee has a right to be considered for promotion and that would be applicable to the present applicants also. In Civil Appeal Nos. 517-518 of 2017 of Union of India & Ors vs Manpreet Singh Poonam and Ors, the same ratio is applied and earlier cases are cited vide their Division Bench judgement dated March 08, 2022 and the court observed that "No officer has a vested right to a promotional post, which is restricted to that of consideration according to law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 31 - M M Sundresh - Full Document

Director, Lift Irrigation Corporation ... vs Pravat Kiran Mohanty And Ors on 12 February, 1991

OA.No.170/00527/2021/CAT/BANGALORE "37. This Court, time and again, has laid emphasis on right to be considered for promotion to be a fundamental right, as was held by K. Ramaswamy, J., in the case of Director, Lift Irrigation Corporation Ltd. v. Pravat Kiran Mohanty [(1991) 2 SCC 295] in paragraph 4 of the report which is reproduced below:
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 33 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Ajit Singh And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 16 September, 1999

38. A Constitution Bench in case of Ajit Singh v. State of Punjab [(1999) 7 SCC 209], laying emphasis on Article 14 and Article 16(1) of the Constitution of India held that if a person who satisfies the eligibility and the criteria for promotion but still is not considered for promotion, then there will be clear violation of his/her's fundamental right. Jagannadha Rao, J. speaking for himself and Anand, CJI., Venkataswami, Pattanaik, Kurdukar, JJ., observed the same as follows in paragraphs 21 and 22 and 27:
Supreme Court of India Cites 38 - Cited by 601 - M J Rao - Full Document

Major General Andil Kumar Shukla Vsm vs Union Of India on 8 January, 2018

In the case of Civil Appeal No. 5966 of 2021 arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 5435 of 2020 of Ajay Kumar Shukla and Ors vs Arvind Rai and Ors, the Hon'ble Apex Court decided similar issue and has further cited that "This Court in Major General H.M. Singh, VSM vs. UOI and Another, again reiterated the legal position, i.e. right to be considered for promotion as a fundamental right enshrined under Article 14 and Article 16 of the Constitution of 18 OA.No.170/00527/2021/CAT/BANGALORE India. The relevant extract from paragraph 28 is reproduced below:
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 32 - S A Nazeer - Full Document
1