Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.31 seconds)
Pranab Baruah vs N F Railway And 5 Ors on 17 August, 2021 cites

P.S. Sadasivaswamy vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 7 October, 1974

6) The learned standing counsel for the respondents had submitted that the petitioner was promoted by the purported order dated 15.05.2014. However, thereafter, he had been punished with major penalty by order dated 08.02.2015, which had not only wiped away his promotion but the petitioner had accepted his demotion to the post of Sub-Inspector. Thereafter, several persons had been promoted to the next higher post of Assistant Security Commissioner/ Assistant Commandant between 15.05.2014 till date, who are not parties to this writ petition and whose rights would be adversely affected if the petitioner is now directed to be promoted on the strength of order dated 15.05.2014. Thus, by referring to the case of P.S. Sadasivaswamy (supra) and Nandlal Jaiswal (supra), it is submitted that delay on part of the petitioner to approach this Court had vitiated the writ petition and as such the petitioner was not entitled to any relief.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 685 - A Alagiriswami - Full Document

State Of Madhya Pradesh & Ors vs Nandlal Jaiswal & Ors on 24 October, 1986

6) The learned standing counsel for the respondents had submitted that the petitioner was promoted by the purported order dated 15.05.2014. However, thereafter, he had been punished with major penalty by order dated 08.02.2015, which had not only wiped away his promotion but the petitioner had accepted his demotion to the post of Sub-Inspector. Thereafter, several persons had been promoted to the next higher post of Assistant Security Commissioner/ Assistant Commandant between 15.05.2014 till date, who are not parties to this writ petition and whose rights would be adversely affected if the petitioner is now directed to be promoted on the strength of order dated 15.05.2014. Thus, by referring to the case of P.S. Sadasivaswamy (supra) and Nandlal Jaiswal (supra), it is submitted that delay on part of the petitioner to approach this Court had vitiated the writ petition and as such the petitioner was not entitled to any relief.
Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 869 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document
1   2 Next