Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.21 seconds)

Krishna Kanta Ghosh vs Jadu Kasya And Ors. on 5 February, 1915

This does not define the status of the person holding the homestead but merely deals with the incidents of his tenancy of the homestead. It may be doubted if Sub-section (5) of Section 20 can be properly said to deal with any incident of a tenancy, for the section occurs in Chap. V where there is a series of sections beginning a little later ' (with Section 23) under the heading "incidents of occupancy right". The distinction between the status of the tenant and the incidents of the tenancy comes out in [such cases as Krishna Kanta Ghosh v. Jadu Kasya 28 Ind. Cas. 839 : 21 C.L.J. 475 at p. 478 : 19 C.W.N. 914 where their Lordships observed:
Calcutta High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 10 - Full Document
1