Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 25 (0.36 seconds)Section 13 in Cantonments Act, 1924 [Entire Act]
Babu Verghese & Ors vs Bar Council Of Kerala & Ors on 16 March, 1999
In Babu Verghese and Ors. v. Bar Council of Kerala and Ors. (supra), the Apex Court has specifically affirmed the principle that if the mariner of doing a particular act is prescribed under any statute, the act must be done in that manner or not at all. In this behalf, the Court observed as follows:
Cantonments Act, 1924
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
M/S. Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd vs Union Of India And Anr on 28 April, 2004
In view of the principles laid down in the Kusum Ingots and Alloys Ltd. (supra) it cannot be disputed that part of cause of action has arisen at Delhi. Even on principles of forum convenience, I am unable to agree with the respondents that this Court does not have territorial jurisdiction to entertain and adjudicate upon the instant matter.
B. Krishan vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 26 October, 2004
24. I find that this Court in the judgment dated 25th October, 2004 rendered in B. Krishan v. Union of India in : WP (C) No. 13355/2004 set aside the nomination of the respondent No. 3 as the original records which were produced by the respondent No. 1 showed that:
Bakhtawar Singh Bal Kishan vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 10 February, 1988
"MINISTRY OF defense
D(W&C)
Subject: Writ petition (Civil) No. 13355 of 2004 filed by Shri B. Kishan v. UOI and Ors. in the Delhi High Court.
Nasir Ahmad And Ors. vs King-Emperor on 12 May, 1927
These cases were considered by a three-Judge Bench of this Court in State of U.P. v. Singhara Singh and the rule laid down in Nazir Ahmad case was again upheld. This rule has since been applied to the exercise of jurisdiction by Courts and has also been recognised as a salutary principle of administrative law."
B. Krishna Bhat vs Union Of India And Ors on 19 March, 1990
10. It appears that the Central Government issued a notification dated 27th July, 2004 nominating Shri J. Pratap as the civilian member of the Secunderabad Cantonment Board. This nomination was contended to be contrary to the mandatory provisions of Section 14(2)(c) of the Act and was challenged by the present petitioner in WP (C) No. 13355/2004 entitled B. Krishna v. UOI and Ors. vide a detailed judgment passed on 25th October, 2004, the writ petition was allowed.