Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.23 seconds)
Prabhakiran Jain vs M/S S R Jewels Pvt Ltd & Anr on 15 May, 2025 cites

Lalit Kumar Sharma And Anr vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 6 May, 2008

20. The Complainant has relied on the case of Arun Kumar (supra) to submit that the case of Lalit Kumar Sharma (supra) is distinguishable. In this case, after the Accused was convicted under S.138 NI Act, the Parties entered into a Settlement in Lok Adalat and the cheque was issued which got dishonoured and second Complaint was filed. In this backdrop, it was held that Settlement in Lok Adalat is like a Civil Decree which is a legally enforceable debt, for which the Complaint under S.138 NI Act can be filed Signature Not Verified Signed By:VIKAS CRL.M.C. 5779/2018 Page 6 of 8 ARORA Signing Date:21.05.2025 18:22:57 afresh.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 82 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Dayawati vs Yogesh Kumar Gosain on 17 October, 2017

In the light of the case of Dayawati (supra), actually the two Complaints got subsumed into the Settlement which was acted upon. The option with the Complainant is to either seek Execution under Section 431 read with Section 421 Cr.P.C. or to initiate the proceedings under Section 2(b) Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. There could not have been any subsequent trial on the Complaint in which the parties had arrived at the Settlement.
Delhi High Court Cites 79 - Cited by 66 - A Malhotra - Full Document
1   2 Next