The Chancellor And Anr. vs Dr Bijayananda Kar And Ors. on 4 November, 1993
In The Chancellor, Utkal University v. Dr. Bijayananda
Kar (1994) 1 SCC 169, Hon'ble the Supreme Court observed thus:
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.22 seconds)Chairman, J&K State Board Of Education vs Feyaz Ahmed Malik & Ors on 28 January, 2000
In Chairman, J&K State Board of Education v. Feyaz
Ahmed Malik & Others (2000) 3 SCC 59, Hon'ble the Supreme Court
highlighted the significance of expert bodies in the field of education.
The Dental Council Of India vs Subharti K.K.B. Charitable Trust & Anr on 25 April, 2001
In Dental Council of India v. Subharti K.K.B. Charitable
Trust & Another (2001) 5 SCC 486, Hon'ble the Supreme Court held
that the High Court's jurisdiction is extremely limited to interfere with
the discretion exercised by the expert bodies.
Medical Council Of India vs Sarang & Ors on 28 August, 2001
In Medical Council of India v. Sarang & Others (2001) 8
SCC 427, Hon'ble the Supreme Court held that the Courts should
ordinarily refrain from interpreting technical rules and regulations and
instead defer such matters to domain experts.
Rajbir Singh Dalal vs Chaudhari Devi Lal University & Anr on 6 August, 2008
In Dr. Rajbir Singh Dalal v. Chaudhari Devi Lal
University, Sirsa & Another (2008) 9 SCC 284, Hon'ble the Supreme
Court observed that it is not appropriate for the Court to sit in appeal
over the opinions rendered by experts, reaffirming judicial restraint in
such matters.
B.C.Mylarappa @ Chikkamylarappa vs R.Venkatsubbaiah & Ors on 3 October, 2008
In B.C. Mylarappa alias Dr. Chikkamylarappa v. Dr. R.
Venkatasubbaiah & Others (2008) 14 SCC 306, Hon'ble the Supreme
Court affirmed the established legal position regarding importance and
relevance of the recommendations made by the expert committees.
All India Council For Technical Edu vs Surinder Kumar Dhawan & Ors on 18 February, 2009
18. Taking into consideration the law laid down by Hon'ble
the Supreme Court referred above, the report submitted by the
Committee dated 13.01.2020 (Annexure R-2) that the petitioner is not
eligible for consideration for appointment on the post of TGT Science
(non medical) and as there is no allegation of mala fide alleged against
the Committee, as such, no relief can be granted to the petitioner.
1