Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.06 seconds)

Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sangeeta Devi & Ors on 22 February, 2016

In   view   of   my   findings   on   issues   no.   1   and   2,   I   award compensation of Rs. 2,40,000/­ alongwith interest @ 9% per annum in favour of petitioner and against the respondents w.e.f. date of filing of the petition i.e. 16.03.15 till the date of its realization (Reliance placed on judgment "Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Sangeeta Devi & Ors bearing MAC. APP. 165/2011 decided on 22.02.2016). However, it would be open to the insurance company to recover the award amount from respondent no. 2 after payment of compensation   amount,   in   accordance   with   law.     Issue   no.   3   is   decided accordingly.

Vinod Kumar @ Bittoo vs Roshni & Ors. on 5 July, 2012

26.        Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the matter titled as " Vinod Kumar  Bitoo Vs.   Roshni   &   Ors."  passed   in   appeal   bearing  no.  MAC.APP   518/2010 decided on 05.07.12, has held as under:­ " It is difficult to measure the pain and suffering in terms of money which is suffered by a victim on account of serious injuries caused to him in a motor vehicle accident. Since the   compensation   is   required   to   be   paid   for   pain   and suffering   an   attempt   must   be   made   to   award compensation   which   may   have   some   objective   relation with the pain and suffering underwent by the victim. For this purpose, the Claims Tribunal and the Courts normally consider the nature of injury; the part of the body where the injuries were sustained, surgeries, if any, underwent by the victim, confinement in the hospital and the duration of treatment".
Delhi High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 483 - G P Mittal - Full Document
1   2 Next