Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (1.13 seconds)Section 476 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Emperor vs Bansi Sheikh on 7 December, 1923
We find, however, another case in Emperor v. Bansi Sheikh in which that case has been disapproved of as regards certain particulars. It is pointed out there that if a person puts forward a document as supporting his claim in any matter, whether that document is acted upon by the Court or used in evidence is immaterial for the purpose of constituting use of the document by the party within the meaning of Section 471, I.P.C. In this ease the matter rests wholly on this that from some interest in or desire to assist the defence the accused filed a document for the purposes of the suit in advance of a trial. That in my judgment is using a document. The wider the definition of the word "use" the better as the use has to be fraudulent.
Moheswari Prosad Singh Deo vs Emperor on 21 May, 1914
3. The second question is whether this document as it was not given in evidence can be said to have been used by appellant 1 at all. It is said that it was filed as a document in the list of documents filed by this accused. Reliance has been placed on the case of Ambica Prosad Singh v. Emperor [1908] 35 Cal. 820.
1