Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.22 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 1 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Section 446 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Directorate Of Enforcement vs M. Gopal Reddy on 24 February, 2023
In Directorate of Enforcement v. M. Gopal Reddy, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1862,
decided on February 24, 2022, Hon'ble Supreme Court holds,
[33]. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the
reasoning given by the High Court and as observed hereinabove, the
rigour of Sec on 45 of the Act, 2002 shall be applicable even with respect
to the applica on under Sec on 438 Cr. P.C. and therefore, the impugned
judgment and order passed by the High Court gran ng an cipatory bail
to respondent No. 1 herein in connec on with F. No. ECIR/HYZO/36/2020
dated 15.12.2020 is unsustainable.
Mahdoom Bava vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 20 March, 2023
In Mahdoom Bava v. Central Bureau of Inves ga on, 2023:INSC:262 [Para 10-11],
Law Finder Doc Id # 2165475, Cr. No.853 of 2023, decided on 20.03.2023, Supreme
Court holds,
[10]. More importantly, the appellants apprehend arrest, not at the
behest of the CBI but at the behest of the Trial Court. This is for the reason
that in some parts of the country, there seems to be a prac ce followed
by Courts to remand the accused to custody, the moment they appear in
response to the summoning order. The correctness of such a prac ce has
to be tested in an appropriate case. Suffice for the present to note that it
is not the CBI which is seeking their custody, but the appellants apprehend
that they may be remanded to custody by the Trial Court and this is why
they seek protec on. We must keep this in mind while deciding the fate of
these appeals.