Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (1.01 seconds)

Dr. Rohit Kumar vs Secretary Office Of Lt. Governor Of ... on 15 July, 2021

(ii) There must be a report before the Court that the person against whom warrant was issued had absconded or had been concealing himself so that the warrant of arrest could not be executed against him. However, the Court is not bound to take evidence in this regard before issuing a Proclamation under Section 82 (1) of the Cr.P.C.. (See Rohit Kumar Vs. State of Delhi: 2008 Crl. J. 2561).
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 25 - I Banerjee - Full Document

Birad Dan vs The State on 18 September, 1957

(viii) The Court issuing the proclamation has to make a statement in writing in its order that the proclamation was duly published on a specified day in a manner specified in Section 82(2)(i) of the Cr.P.C.. Such statement in writing by the Court is declared to be conclusive evidence that the requirements of Section 82 have been complied with and that the proclamation was published on such day. (See Birad Dan Vs. State: 1958 CriLJ 965).
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 12 - Cited by 30 - Full Document

Devendra Singh Negi Alias Debu vs State Of U.P. And Anr. on 18 March, 1993

(xi) The conditions specified in Section 82(2) of the Cr.P.C. for the publication of a Proclamation against 5 of 8 an absconder are mandatory. Any non-compliance therewith cannot be cured as an 'irregularity' and renders the Proclamation and proceedings subsequent thereto a nullity. (See Devendra Singh Negi alias Debu Vs. State of U.P. and another: 1994 CriLJ 1783 and Pal Singh Vs. The State: 1955 CriLJ 318)."
Allahabad High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 53 - Full Document
1   2 Next