Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.24 seconds)Section 7 in The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954
Sonal Food Products And Ors. vs State Through Food Inspector (Pfa), ... on 17 November, 2006
12. As far as defence of accused no. 5 & 6 is concerned, the Ld.
Defence Counsel during the course of arguments relied upon the Case
Law cited as 2007 (1) F.A.C. 1 titled as M/s Sonal Food Products &
Others Vs. State through FI (PFA) G.N.C.T. of Delhi. In the given
context the accused no. 5 i.e. M/s Dharam Pal Satya Pal has been
shown as the 'Brand Owner Firm' and accused no. 6 is the Nominee
thereof. The Memo of Parties annexed with the Complaint in question is
well indicative thereof. It is also worth mentioning that as per the
contents of the complaint, nothing sort of role of the accused no. 5 Firm
i.e. the 'Brand Owner Firm' has been shown except the Firm being the
Owner of the Brand 'M/s Dharam Pal Satya Pal'. The Case Law cited
herein above and relied upon in defence; for and on behalf of accused
nos. 5 & 6 is squarely applicable in the given context.
1