Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.58 seconds)

M/S Patil Automation Private Limited vs Rakheja Engineers Private Limited on 17 August, 2022

In Patil Automation Private Limited and Ors. v. Rakheja Engineers Private Limited (supra), the Supreme Court has authoritatively held that the provisions of Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 are mandatory and failure to comply with the same would entail rejection of the plaint. However, in the present case, the question whether the provisions under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 are mandatory or not is not in issue; the point for consideration is whether the provisions of Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 are applicable to the suit instituted by the appellant.
Supreme Court of India Cites 85 - Cited by 97 - K Joseph - Full Document

Chandra Kishore Chaurasia vs R A Perfumery Works Private Limited on 27 October, 2022

In the case of Chandra Kishore Chaurasia (Supra), one of the questions before the Hon'ble High Court was that as to whether filing of an application for grant of an exemption or waiver by a plaintiff from complying with the provisions of above Section was necessary in case where he was seeking any urgent relief and whether the order passed by a Commercial Court rejecting or dismissing the plaint of a case due to non- compliance of said Section in such a case was legally correct or not.
Delhi High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 15 - V Bakhru - Full Document
1   2 Next