Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.96 seconds)M/S S.J. And S.P. Family Trust vs Chhattisgarh State Minor Forest ... on 18 May, 2018
With regard to providing a clear and cogent response to the Appellant, the Commission referred to
the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in J P Aggarwal v. Union of India (WP (C) no.
7232/2009 wherein it was held that:
Vivek Mittal vs B.P.Srivastava & Others on 24 August, 2009
The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Shri Vivek Mittal v. B.P. Srivastava, W.P.(C)
19122/2006 dated 24.08.2009 had upheld the view of the CIC and observed
".....that a CPIO cannot escape his obligations and duties by stating that persons
appointed under him had failed to collect documents and information. The Act as framed,
castes obligation upon the CPIOs and fixes responsibility in case there is failure or delay
in supply of information. It is the duty of the CPIOs to ensure that the provisions of the Act
are fully complied with and in case of default, necessary consequences follow".
Mujibur Rehman vs Central Information Commission on 28 April, 2009
In this context, the
Commission referred to the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Mujibur Rehman vs Central
Information Commission (W.P. (C) 3845/2007)(Dated 28 April, 2009) wherein it had been held as
under:
Section 5 in The Trade Unions Act, 1926 [Entire Act]
The Trade Unions Act, 1926
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
1