Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.31 seconds)

Durgacharan Misra vs State Of Orissa & Ors on 27 August, 1987

8.It is seen from the records that the respondent had registered the FIR for the offences under Section 188 IPC. Further, on reading of the FIR in entirety no averments for offences under Section 353 have been made out. This Hon'ble Court in 1989 Crl.L.J 1833 (Murugesan and others vs. State of Tamil Nadu) referring to AIR 1966 SC 1775 (Durgacharan Waik vs. State of Orissa) has held that provision of Section 195 Cr.P.C cannot be evaded by resorting to devices or camouflage of clubbing other cognizable offences not actually made out.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 267 - K J Shetty - Full Document

P. Murugesan And Others vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Others on 3 February, 1993

8.It is seen from the records that the respondent had registered the FIR for the offences under Section 188 IPC. Further, on reading of the FIR in entirety no averments for offences under Section 353 have been made out. This Hon'ble Court in 1989 Crl.L.J 1833 (Murugesan and others vs. State of Tamil Nadu) referring to AIR 1966 SC 1775 (Durgacharan Waik vs. State of Orissa) has held that provision of Section 195 Cr.P.C cannot be evaded by resorting to devices or camouflage of clubbing other cognizable offences not actually made out.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 245 - B P Reddy - Full Document
1