Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.82 seconds)

Babu Ram Prakash Chandra Maheshwari vs Antarim Zila Parishad Muzaffar Nagar on 2 August, 1968

16. Thus in cases involving violation of principles of natural justice, exhaustion of the alternative remedy is not a bar for invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Babu Ram v. Zilla Parishad ; P.R. Venkatiah v. A.P. Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd. 1990 (1) APLJ 109.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 640 - V Ramaswami - Full Document

Bhadrachalam Paper Boards Limited, ... vs Union Of India (Uoi), Through ... on 13 November, 1995

15. Exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is discretionary and the self imposed restrictions not to exercise discretion, where there is an effective alternative remedy in existence, cannot be construed as a prohibition. The rule that before invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of the High Court, the alternative remedy should be exhausted, is a rule of convenience and discretion and not a rule of law. Bhadrachalam Paper Boards Ltd. v. Union of India 1993 (1) An.W.R. 139.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 24 - Cited by 3 - B S Reddy - Full Document
1