Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.57 seconds)Section 2 in The Essential Commodities Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954
The Essential Commodities Act, 1955
Amrit Banaspati Co. Ltd. & Anr vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors on 27 July, 1964
In support of this conclusion, the High
Court has relied upon a decision of this
197
Court in M/s. Amrit Banaspati Co., Ltd. v. The State of
Uttar Pradesh(1). The High Court negatived the appellants'
argument that the Sharbat in question was either prepared or
sold as a medicinal product. In this connection the High
Court has commented' on the fact that the label borne by the
bottles containing the Sharbat did not show that it was for
medicinal use only as required by cl. 16 (1) (c) of the
Fruit Order- According to the High Court, clause 1 1 of the
Fruit Order covered the case of the Sharbat prepared by the
appellants, and so, the impugned order was justified. The
High Court also found that there was no substance in the,
grievance made by the appellants that as a result of this
impugned order, their registered trade-mark label had been
affected.
1