Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.32 seconds)
Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, An Institute ... vs Union Of India & Anr. on 22 April, 2022 cites

Medical Council Of India vs Kalinga Institute Of Medical Sciences ... on 6 May, 2016

22. I may now also refer to the decisions of the Apex Court in Medical Council of India v. Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences &Ors. (2016) 11 SCC 530 and Medical Council of India vs. The Chairman, S.R. Educational and Charitable Trust and Anr. (2018) SCC OnLine 2276. relied upon by the respondents. I find that in the said decisions, the Apex Court has emphasized on the primacy to be given to the report of the inspection committee. In the present case, it is an admitted position that the inspection committee did not find any deficiency in the teaching staff of the petitioner. On the other hand, the visitation committee had not only specifically observed that each of the 12 teachers was fully eligible as per the MSR, 2016 but had also, in no uncertain terms certified that the college was having the requisite 12 teachers. I, therefore, find that these decisions do not, in any manner, forward the case of the respondent.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 71 - M B Lokur - Full Document

Medical Council Of India vs The Chairman Sr Educational And ... on 29 October, 2018

22. I may now also refer to the decisions of the Apex Court in Medical Council of India v. Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences &Ors. (2016) 11 SCC 530 and Medical Council of India vs. The Chairman, S.R. Educational and Charitable Trust and Anr. (2018) SCC OnLine 2276. relied upon by the respondents. I find that in the said decisions, the Apex Court has emphasized on the primacy to be given to the report of the inspection committee. In the present case, it is an admitted position that the inspection committee did not find any deficiency in the teaching staff of the petitioner. On the other hand, the visitation committee had not only specifically observed that each of the 12 teachers was fully eligible as per the MSR, 2016 but had also, in no uncertain terms certified that the college was having the requisite 12 teachers. I, therefore, find that these decisions do not, in any manner, forward the case of the respondent.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 19 - A Mishra - Full Document

Ref: Case No. 25/2010, 41/2010, ... vs .£33 U?" £~':S5=..Ig1"M'1E':Nt 0'? ... on 16 February, 2012

23. I have also considered the decision of a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Anil Kumar Singh Bhadoria (supra) but find that this decision does not deal with the issues as raised in the present petition. In the said case, the Court was dealing with the power of the respondent no.2 to take action against the teachers, which aspect is not the subject matter of the present petition.
Competition Commission of India Cites 27 - Cited by 1254 - Full Document
1