Ragavendra Kumar vs Firm Prem Machinery And Co on 7 January, 2000
I have perused the rent petition and the averments made
therein. In para 6 it is stated that she wants to settle her son namely
Arpan Mahajan aged 23 years who had recently passed B.Sc. in
C.R.No.8329 of 2010 (O&M) -5-
Information and Technology and is still idle and wants to shift to
Panchkula so that a business of computers could be started for him.
Thus by no stretch of imagination can it be construed to be an
averment that the residential premises are intended to be used as
commercial premises. The only need that has been expressed by the
respondent is that she wants to shift to Panchkula in order to settle her
son in order to enable him to set up a business of computers. It is
evident that the premises are required for settling up a business so
that the son of the respondent can venture out in his business. This
contention therefore has to be rejected in view of the law laid down
by the Supreme Court in Ragavendra Kumar v. Firm Prem
Machinary and Co. AIR 2000 Supreme Court 534 observed as
under :-