Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.29 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Pawan Kumar vs The Delhi Administration on 17 August, 1987
In the case of "Pawan Kumar Vs. The Delhi
Administration", 1989 Cr.LJ 127 Delhi, in which it was
FIR No.124/16 PS Jama Masjid State Vs. Mohd. Alam Page No. 12 of 15
observed as follows :-
Sadhu Singh vs State Of Haryana on 16 January, 2001
In the case of "Sadhu Singh Vs. State of Haryana" 2000 (2) CC
Cases HC 73, the Court took note of the fact that public witnesses were
not joined in investigation to acquit the accused.
Massa Singh And Another vs Financial Commissioner (Appeals-1) ... on 3 December, 2008
In the case of "Massa Singh Vs. State of Punjab" 2000 (2) C.C.
Cases HC 11, conviction was set aside on the ground that it was
obligatory on the part of investigating officer to take assistance of
FIR No.124/16 PS Jama Masjid State Vs. Mohd. Alam Page No. 13 of 15
independent witnesses to lend authenticity to the investigation conducted
by him. It was observed as under :-
Chanan Singh Son Of Kartar Singh vs State Of Haryana on 2 April, 1971
In the case of "Chanan Singh Vs. State" 1986 Crl. Rev. No.720
(P&H) 94, it was held that it was obligatory on the part of the police to join
independent witnesses and the statement of official witness that
witnesses refused to join investigation was rejected as an afterthought.