Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.22 seconds)Section 13 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Narinder Chand Hem Raj & Ors vs Lt. Governor, Administrator, Union ... on 5 October, 1971
In Narinder Chand
Hem Raj and Ors. v. Lt. Governor, Administrator,
Union Territory, Himachal Pradesh and Ors., AIR
1971 SC 2399, their Lordships have opined that no
court can issue a mandate to a legislature to enact
a particular law and similarly, no court can direct
a subordinate legislative body to enact or not to
enact a law which it may be competent to enact.
State Of Himachal Pradesh vs A Parent Of A Student Of Medical College. ... on 11 April, 1985
In State of Himachal Pradesh v. A Parent of a
Student of Medical College, Simla and ors., AIR
1985 SC 910 it has been ruled that the court
cannot usurp the functions assigned to the
executive and the legislature under the
Constitution and it cannot even indirectly require
the executive to introduce a particular legislation
or the legislature to pass it WP(C) No.12787/2009
page 10 of 13 or assume to itself a supervisory role
over the law making activities of the executive and
the legislature.
Chandigarh Administration And Anr. ... vs Manpreet Singh And Ors. Etc. Etc on 18 November, 1991
In Chandigarh Administration and Anr. v.
Manpreet Singh and Ors., AIR 1992 SC 435, their
Lordships of the Apex Court has clearly stated that
the High Court cannot assume the role of a rule
making authority in exercise of the power under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
State Of Jammu & Kashmir vs A.R. Zakki And Others on 6 December, 1991
In State of Jammu & Kashmir v. A. R. Zakki &
Ors, AIR 1992 SC 1546, the principle was
reiterated that a writ of mandamus cannot be
issued to the legislature to enact a particular
legislation and the same is true as regards the
executive when it exercises the power to make
rules which are in the nature of subordinate
legislation.
Municipal Committee, Patiala vs Model Town Residents Asson. & Ors on 1 August, 2007
In Municipal Committee, Patiala v. Model
Town Residents Association and Ors., AIR 2007
SC 2844, though in a different factual WP(C)
No.12787/2009 page 11 of 13 matrix, the Apex
Cont.Case (C) No.165/2008 Page 12 of 25
Court has opined that the High Court has no
power to structure or restructure the legislative
enactments. It has been reiterated that High Court
must ensure that while exercising its jurisdiction
which is supervisory in nature, it should not over
step the well recognized bounds of its own
jurisdiction.