Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.48 seconds)Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. vs Rajesh Kumar Jindal on 8 January, 2019
In Punjab State Power Corporation Limited
Vs. Rajesh Kumar Jindal and Others, (2019) 3 SCC
547, it has been held as under:-
U.P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. & Anr vs Sant Raj Singh & Ors on 12 May, 2006
Sugar Corpn. Ltd. and Another v. Sant Raj Singh and
Others (2006) 9 SCC 82, Union of India and Another
v. Mahajabeen Akhtar (2008) 1 SCC 368, Union of
India v. Dineshan K.K (2008) 1 SCC 586, Union of
India and Others v. Hiranmoy Sen and Others (2008) 1
SCC 630, Official Liquidator v. Dayanand and Others (2008) 10
SCC 1, U.P. SEB and Another v. Aziz Ahmad (2009) 2 SCC 606
of
and State of M.P. and Others v. Ramesh Chandra Bajpai (2009)
13 SCC 635)".
Union Of India And Another vs Mahajabeen Akhtar on 1 November, 2007
Sugar Corpn. Ltd. and Another v. Sant Raj Singh and
Others (2006) 9 SCC 82, Union of India and Another
v. Mahajabeen Akhtar (2008) 1 SCC 368, Union of
India v. Dineshan K.K (2008) 1 SCC 586, Union of
India and Others v. Hiranmoy Sen and Others (2008) 1
SCC 630, Official Liquidator v. Dayanand and Others (2008) 10
SCC 1, U.P. SEB and Another v. Aziz Ahmad (2009) 2 SCC 606
of
and State of M.P. and Others v. Ramesh Chandra Bajpai (2009)
13 SCC 635)".
Union Of India & Ors vs Dineshan K.K on 4 January, 2008
Sugar Corpn. Ltd. and Another v. Sant Raj Singh and
Others (2006) 9 SCC 82, Union of India and Another
v. Mahajabeen Akhtar (2008) 1 SCC 368, Union of
India v. Dineshan K.K (2008) 1 SCC 586, Union of
India and Others v. Hiranmoy Sen and Others (2008) 1
SCC 630, Official Liquidator v. Dayanand and Others (2008) 10
SCC 1, U.P. SEB and Another v. Aziz Ahmad (2009) 2 SCC 606
of
and State of M.P. and Others v. Ramesh Chandra Bajpai (2009)
13 SCC 635)".
Union Of India & Ors vs Hiranmoy Sen & Ors on 12 October, 2007
Sugar Corpn. Ltd. and Another v. Sant Raj Singh and
Others (2006) 9 SCC 82, Union of India and Another
v. Mahajabeen Akhtar (2008) 1 SCC 368, Union of
India v. Dineshan K.K (2008) 1 SCC 586, Union of
India and Others v. Hiranmoy Sen and Others (2008) 1
SCC 630, Official Liquidator v. Dayanand and Others (2008) 10
SCC 1, U.P. SEB and Another v. Aziz Ahmad (2009) 2 SCC 606
of
and State of M.P. and Others v. Ramesh Chandra Bajpai (2009)
13 SCC 635)".
State Of M.P.& Ors vs Ramesh Chandra Bajpai on 28 July, 2009
Sugar Corpn. Ltd. and Another v. Sant Raj Singh and
Others (2006) 9 SCC 82, Union of India and Another
v. Mahajabeen Akhtar (2008) 1 SCC 368, Union of
India v. Dineshan K.K (2008) 1 SCC 586, Union of
India and Others v. Hiranmoy Sen and Others (2008) 1
SCC 630, Official Liquidator v. Dayanand and Others (2008) 10
SCC 1, U.P. SEB and Another v. Aziz Ahmad (2009) 2 SCC 606
of
and State of M.P. and Others v. Ramesh Chandra Bajpai (2009)
13 SCC 635)".
Punjab State Electricity Board And Anr. vs Thana Singh And Ors. on 8 January, 2019
In Punjab State Electricity Board and
Another Vs. Thana Singh and Others, (2019) 4 SCC
113, Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that it is for the
::: Downloaded on - 28/09/2023 20:36:29 :::CIS
14
employer to classify its employees/posts on the basis of
qualifications, duties and responsibilities of the posts
.
State Of Punjab And Ors vs Jagjit Singh And Ors on 26 October, 2016
rt29. It has been reiterated in Jagjit Singh case (supra)
that parity in pay, under the aforesaid principal of 'equal pay
for equal work' cannot be claimed merely on the ground, that
an earlier point of time, the subject post and the reference
post were placed in the same pay scale. The principle 'equal
pay for equal work' is applicable only when it is shown, that
the incumbent of the subject post and the reference post
discharge similar duties and responsibilities while claiming
parity in pay scales under principle of 'equal pay for equal
work' equation in the nature of duties is of paramount
importance and there is no comparison between one set of
employees in one organization and another set of employees
in different organisations, there can be no question of
equation of pay scale under this principle."
Shiba Kumar Dutta & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 24 February, 1997
12. Similarly, in Shiba Kumar Dutta and Others
Vs. Union of India and Others, (1997) 3 SCC 545,
Hon'ble Supreme Court has deprecated the practice
::: Downloaded on - 28/09/2023 20:36:29 :::CIS
11
adopted for invidious discrimination and denial of equal
treatment by the employers to its employees.