Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.29 seconds)Section 66 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Section 65 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
The Indian Succession Act, 1925
Section 57 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Puran Singh And Others vs Dalip Kaur on 8 July, 2019
20. Thus, in the present case, onus to prove his title to the property on
the basis of the Will as propounded by the appellant was upon him. Reliance by
learned counsel for the appellant on decision of this High Court in Puran
Singh and others Vs. Dalip Kaur, 2019 (4) R.C.R (Civil) 786, is of no avail
10 of 12
::: Downloaded on - 02-05-2023 22:46:31 :::
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:062376
RSA No. 3639 of 2003(O&M) 11 2023:PHHC:062376
as question of title based on oral Will was not involved and moreover, specific
provisions of law have not been adverted to therein.
Jitendra Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 6 September, 2021
Hon'ble
the Supreme Court in Jitendra Singh Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and
others, 2021 (4) R.C.R (Civil) 883, held as under:-
Smt. Sawarni vs Smt. Inder Kaur And Others on 23 August, 1996
Gainful reference in this regard can be made to judgment of Hon'ble the
Supreme Court in Smt. Sawarni Vs. Smt. Inder Kaur, 1997 (1) R.C.R (Civil)
41, wherein it has been held that mutation of property in the revenue record
does not create or extinguish title nor has any presumptive value on title and it
only enables the person in whose favour the mutation is ordered to pay land
revenue in record.
Smt. Mam Kauri vs Smt. Lachmi Devi And Ors. on 25 February, 1992
Affidavits executed by some of the parties in Smt. Mam Kauri's case
(supra), it was held cannot be considered to be relinquishment deeds.
1