cites: 117620003

State Of Maharashtra & Anr vs Chandrakant Anant Kulkarni & Ors on 8 September, 1981

Relying upon the LPA No. 614 of 2010 and other connected cases 14 decision in the State of Maharashtra v. Chandrakant Anant Kulkarni, this Court held that a mere chance of promotion was not a condition of service and the fact that there was a reduction in the chance of promotion would not amount to a change in the conditions of service."

Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 120 - O C Reddy - Full Document

S.P. Shivprasad Pipal vs Union Of India & Ors on 15 April, 1998

In S.P.Shivprasad Pipal (supra), Hon'ble Supreme Court in para 19 at page 604 has held as follows:-

Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 99 - S V Manohar - Full Document

Devi Prasad And Ors vs Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Ors on 8 April, 1980

Reliance has also been placed on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Devi Prasad and others vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and others, 1980 (2) SLR 558. On this basis, prayer has been made for the appeals to be accepted by setting aside the judgment impugned.

Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 16 - V R Iyer - Full Document

Union Of India And Others vs S.L. Dutta And Others on 16 November, 1990

In S.L.Dutta's case a change in the promotion policy was challenged on the ground that as a result, service conditions of the respondent were adversely affected since his chances of promotion were reduced.

Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 92 - M H Kania - Full Document

Article 309 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 2 - Cited by 13610

Ghanshayam Dass Sharma vs State Of Haryana And Others on 28 July, 2009

By this order, we propose to decide LPA Nos. 614, 643 to 652, 917 and 918 of 2010, preferred by the State of Haryana and LPA No. 1522 of 2010 preferred by the private respondents in the writ petition as all these LPAs arise out of decision dated 28.07.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No. 7303 of 1999 titled as Ghanshayam Dass Sharma vs. State of Haryana and others, vide which along with this, other writ petitions preferred by the similarly placed employees were allowed, who LPA No. 614 of 2010 and other connected cases 4 had given their option for absorption in Soil Conservation Cadre with directions to the State of Haryana to reconsider and re-decide the entire issue by taking into consideration only the seniority and the resultant effect thereof on the chances of promotion while allocating officials to different cadres.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 4 - R Singh - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search