Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.28 seconds)
Maharishi Markandeshwar University ... vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others on 7 January, 2021 cites

Maharishi Markandeshwar Medical ... vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Ors on 28 April, 2017

15. Though in Maharishi Markandeshwar University (supra), issue was whether the colleges opened by full-fledged independent university can be compelled to affiliate with Himachal Pradesh University, but Hon'ble Apex Court while exploring answer to aforesaid question, categorically observed that It is unfathomable as to how sub section (2) of this provision will take within its sweep another independent University established under a special State Legislation or a constituent college of such University. That general provision may apply to all other educational institutions situated within the State, but certainly not to an independent University established under a special State Legislation such as the 2010 Act or to the constituent college of such an independent University. Most importantly, in aforesaid judgment in paragraph 34, Hon'ble Apex Court held that once it is noted that appellant No.2 (petitioner) is an independent and full-
Supreme Court of India Cites 52 - Cited by 80 - A M Khanwilkar - Full Document

Maharishi Markandeshwar University & ... vs State Of H.P And Others on 20 May, 2020

10. Yet in another case titled Mahrishi Markandey University and another vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others (CWP ::: Downloaded on - 07/01/2021 20:38:25 :::HCHP 18 No. 4119 of 2020), Division Bench of this Court, while dealing with prayer of petitioners to allow them to admit 15% of total intake as NRI seats again reiterated that petitioner-University .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

P.A. Inamdar & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 12 August, 2005

In PA Inamdar (supra) Hon'ble Apex Court, while dealing with issue of reservation has held that States have no power to insist on seat sharing in the unaided private professional educational institutions by fixing a quota of seats between the management and the State. The State cannot insist on private educational institutions which receive no aid from the State to implement State's policy on reservation for granting admission on lesser percentage of marks, i.e. on any criterion except merit because such imposition of quota of seats or enforcing reservation policy of State on available seats on unaided institutions are acts constituting serious encroachment on the autonomy of the private unaided institution as they are not deriving any aid from State funds, can have their own admissions if fair, transparent, non-exploitative and based on merit.
Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 737 - R C Lahoti - Full Document
1   2 Next