Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.45 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 363 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 279 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 304A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 227 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Samaj Parivartan Samudaya vs State Of Karnataka on 15 January, 2014
Apex Court in the case of Anju Chaudhary Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another reported in (2013) 6 SCC 384 discussing the previous decision in the case of Samaj Parivartan Samudaya Vs. State of Karnataka reported in (2012) 7 SCC 407 has laid down that law does not contemplate grant of any personal hearing to a suspect at this stage.
Section 201 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Yogendra Yadav & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr on 21 July, 2014
4. Sri H. N. Singh, learned Sr. Advocate appearing for the opposite party no. 2 as well as learned A.G.A. argued that although power conferred under Section 319 Cr.P.C. was exercised by the court below at the stage of the argument after a gap of about 14 years yet there is sufficient evidence against the revisionists to proceed with the trial. Delay in moving the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. does not create any bar to exercise jurisdiction under Section 319 Cr.P.C. It is further argued that facts mentioned in FIR was written down in the presence and on dictation of police. Involvement of the revisionists in the present matter is supported with the statement of P.W.-1., P.W.-2 and P.W-3 made before the court below on oath. A lengthy cross examination has also been made from the witnesses. All the requirement to exercise jurisdiction under Section 319 Cr.P.C. are available in the present matter. There is no illegality, infirmity or perversity in the impugned order. A prima facie case is made out. There was no occasion to issue notice to the present revisionists for hearing on the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. Ratio laid down in Jogendra Yadav case (Supra) is only regarding availability of opportunity under Section 227 Cr.P.C. to the accused summoned on the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to face trial.
Mani Pushpak Joshi vs The State Of Uttarakhand on 17 October, 2019
4. Mani Pushpak Joshi Vs. State of Uttarakhand and another reported in (2019) 9 SCC 805.