Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.24 seconds)
Ruksana Badar vs Shaan Mohammad on 23 August, 2025 cites

Brahma Nand Puri vs Neki Puri on 24 November, 1964

38. The aforesaid arguments is without any basis either in law or facts. The plaintiff has herself failed to prove any document on the court to show that she is the owner of the suit property or that she has any right to claim possession of the suit property from the defendants. It is trite law that the plaintiff has to stands on her own legs and she cannot take the benefit of weakness of defendant's case. It was held in case of Brahma Nand Puri Vs. Neki Puri (Supra) by Hon'ble Supreme Court as far as that in the year 1965 that in a suit for ejectment, plaintiff has to succeed or fail on the title that he establishes and if he cannot succeed on the strength of his title, his suit must fail notwithstanding that the defendant in possession has no title to the suit property. Resultantly, plaintiff has failed to prove that she is entitled to possession of the suit property alogwith rent and mesne profits.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 46 - N R Ayyangar - Full Document
1   2 Next