Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.24 seconds)Section 381 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 144 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Air Force Act, 1950
United India Insurance Co.Ltd vs M/S.Harchand Rai Chandan Lal on 24 September, 2004
In United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Harchand Rai Chandan Lal, (2004) 8 SCC 644, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that:-
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd vs Sony Cheriyan on 19 August, 1999
In Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sony Cheriyan, (1999) 6 SCC 451, the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that:-
Ravneet Singh Bagga vs Klm Royal Dutch Airlines And Anr on 2 November, 1999
In Ravneet Singh Bagga v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, (2000) 1 SCC 66, the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that:-
Rubi(Chandra) Dutta vs M/S United India Insurance Co.Ltd on 18 March, 2011
10. As was held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rubi Chandra Dutta Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. [(2011) 11 SCC 269], the scope in a Revision Petition is limited. Such powers can be exercised only if there is some prima facie jurisdictional error appearing in the impugned order.
Sunil Kumar Maity vs State Bank Of India on 21 January, 2022
In Sunil Kumar Maity Vs. State Bank of India & Ors. [AIR (2022) SC 577] held that "the revisional jurisdiction of the National Commission under Section 21(b) of the said Act is extremely limited. It should be exercised only in case as contemplated within the parameters specified in the said provision, namely when it appears to the National Commission that the State Commission had exercised a jurisdiction not vested in it by law, or had failed to exercise jurisdiction so vested, or had acted in the exercise of its jurisdiction illegally or with material irregularity. "
Rajiv Shukla vs Gold Rush Sales And Services Ltd . on 8 September, 2022
11. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rajiv Shukla vs Gold Rush Sales And Services Ltd. Civil Appeal No. 5928 of 2022, decided on 8 September, 2022, held that:-
1