Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 23 (2.55 seconds)

Acharaparambath Pradeepan & Anr. à ... vs State Of Kerala à Respondents on 15 December, 2006

"50. Undue delay in conducting a TIP has a serious bearing on the credibility of the identification process. Though there is no fixed timeline within which the TIP must be conducted and the consequence of the delay would depend upon the facts and circumstances of the case [Acharaparambath Pradeepan v. State of Kerala, (2006) 13 SCC 643 : (2008) 1 SCC (Cri) 241] , it is imperative to hold the TIP at the earliest. The possibility of the TIP witnesses seeing the accused is sufficient to cast doubt about their credibility. The following decisions of this Court on the consequence of delay in conducting TIP have emphasised that the possibility of
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 89 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1   2 3 Next