Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 52 (0.50 seconds)Section 52 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Partition Act, 1893 [Entire Act]
The Hindu Succession Act, 1956
Section 146 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Thomson Press (India) Ltd vs Nanak Builders & Investrs.P.Ltd & Ors on 21 February, 2013
79. The decision in Vidur Impex (supra) was also considered in
paragraph 25 of Thomson Press (supra) in which paragraph 41 of
Vidur Impex (supra) was considered.
Section 23 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
T.Ravi & Anr vs B.Chinna Narasimha & Ors. Etc on 21 March, 2017
75. The said decision also considered the effect of transfer
pendent lite as considered in Thomson Press (India) Ltd (supra) and
T. Ravi v. B. Chinna Narasimha,.39
Vidur Impex & Traders Pvt.Ltd.& Ors vs Tosh Apartments Pvt.Ltd.& Ors on 21 August, 2012
"11. The same issue was considered in Vidur Impex and
Traders (P) Ltd. v. Tosh Apartments (P) Ltd. [(2012) 8 SCC 384 :
Styabrata Biswas vs Kalyan Kumar Kisku on 27 January, 1994
(Satyabrata Biswas case [Satyabrata Biswas v. Kalyan Kumar
Kisku, (1994) 2 SCC 266] , SCC p. 276, para 23)
"23. ... Such an order cannot be circumvented by
parties with impunity and expect the court to confer its
blessings. It does not matter that to the contempt
proceedings Somani Builders was not a party. It
cannot gain an advantage in derogation of the rights of
the parties, who were litigating originally. If the right of
44
sub-tenancy is recognised, how is status quo as of 15-