Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 28 (0.74 seconds)
Sh. Lakhmi Chand vs Union Of India on 24 July, 2008 cites

Raj Bala vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 22 July, 2003

25 The Ld. Counsel for the petitioners herein has relied upon the same arguments which were addressed by the counsel for the petitioners in the case of Raj Bal Vs UOI on the aspect if this reference court does not consider the sale deeds proved by the petitioners in their evidence, however not admitted by the counsel for the petitioners, for fixing the market value of the acquired land and the reference court agrees with the rate fixed by the LAC as per the indicative price fixed by the Govt. of NCT of Delhi then the petitioners are entitled to increase @ 11.5% per 33 annum on the compensation amount assessed by the LAC from 09.08.2001 i.e. the date of indicative price fixed by the Govt. for agricultural land to 18.07.2003 i.e. the date of notification u/s 4 of the LA Act. In this context, the counsel for petitioners have relied upon the aforesaid judgment dt. 11.05.2006 passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in LA Appl. No.866/2005 along with other LA Appl nos.
Delhi High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 77 - B D Ahmed - Full Document

Sh. Mahender Singh vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 11 May, 2006

26 Since, the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the aforesaid cases i.e. Mahender Singh & Gajraj Singh (Supra) has given compounded increase @ 11.5% annually on the compensation awarded, therefore, my decision is also supported with the aforesaid judgments of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi and also the award/ judgment dt. 14.07.2008 passed by this reference in LAC No.226/1/07 entitled Raj Bal Vs UOI & Anr. Thus, I hold that the petitioners herein are entitled to compounded increase @ 11.5% annually on the compensation amount of Rs.15.70 lacs per acre fixed by this reference court of the land in question as per their shares from the date i.e. 09.08.2001 till the date of acquisition of the land i.e. 18.07.2003 which roughly comes to the total enhanced compensation of Rs.19,20,568/­ per acre (i.e. total amount fixed at Rs.19,20,568/­ per acre - Rs.15,70,000/­ per acre 36 assessed by the LAC = Rs.3,50,568/­ per acre enhanced) as on 18.07.2003. The petitioners have not led any evidence for other claims as averred in the reference petition, therefore, they are not entitled for the same. These issues are answered accordingly.
Delhi High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 30 - S Kumar - Full Document

Rameshwar Solanki vs Union Of India on 3 February, 1995

Even in the cases of A. Mangla Gauri and Rameshwar Solanki (Supra) relied upon by the claimants, 1/3 deduction was held to be just and fair. Ex.P­3 in our opinion could not have been ignored by the Ld. Reference Court. Golden Rule of Averages could have been safely applied by the Reference Court for determining the fair market value of the land. Ex.R­4 indicates the value of the agricultural land in village Mundaka @ Rs.1 lakh per bigha. This sale deed was executed on 14.03.1994 i.e. nearly 6 months subsequent to the date of notification dt. 15.10.1993 issued under section 4 of the Act while Ex.P­3 was executed on 27.02.1990 whereby the land in village Mundaka was sold for Rs.1,25,000/­ per bigha. Giving a reasonable increase on 27 the value reflected in Ex.P­3 for the intervening period of 3 years, the amount would come to nearly Rs.1,70,000/­ per bigha while reducing the amount of R­4 at the same rate for the intervening period of 6 months, the amount would come to Rs.94,000/­ per bigha and average of both of them would give market value of Rs.1,32,000/­ per bigha.''
Delhi High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 329 - A K Srivastava - Full Document

Kehar Singh And Ors. vs Punjab State Through Land Acquisition ... on 11 April, 1991

(b) The claimants would be entitled to increase in the awarded amount of comepnsation from 1st April, 1996 to 15th November, 1996 (the date of notification under section 4 under the Act) @ 11.5% compounded annually on the compensation awarded by the Reference Court/ Collector that would roughly give them total enhanced compensation of Rs.1,99,904.68 p. Per bigha.....'' In the reported judgment in LPA No.279 of 1984 as Kehar Singh & Ors. Vs Punjab State through Land Acquisition Collector, Punjab, PWDB & R, Jullundur & Ors 148 the Punjab Law Reporter (Vol. CI­1992­1), it was held by the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court that :
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 18 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next