Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.30 seconds)

Avtar Singh vs Union Of India & Ors on 21 July, 2016

14. As per the said case [Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and Others, (2016) 8 SCC 471], para 38.10 comes to the aid of the respondent, because in this case, the information sought in verification roll was not specific and vague in nature. The respondent has specifically disclosed the information which was required to be furnished. Considering the subsequent development of the clean acquittal of respondent for the petty offences, it requires consideration objectively by the authority, about the question of fitness, ignoring the issue of supressing the information. Even in case where the information regarding pending criminal case is truthfully furnished and on acquittal therein, an employer has the discretion to consider the antecedents while issuing the letter of appointment.
Supreme Court of India Cites 38 - Cited by 1443 - A Mishra - Full Document
1   2 Next