Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.22 seconds)State Of Bihar & Ors. Etc. Etc vs M/S. Suprabhat Steel Limited & Ors., ... on 17 November, 1998
e) The learned counsel has relied upon the judgment passed by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Bihar and Others
v. Suprabhat Steel Ltd. and Others reported in (1999) 1 SCC 31
and submits that similar view has been taken by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the case of State of Orissa and others vs. Tata
Sponge Iron Limited reported in (2007) 8 SCC 189.
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
M/S. Coastal Paper Ltd vs Commnr. Of Central Excise, ... on 21 July, 2015
Coastal Paper Limited vs Commissioner of Central
Excise Vishakhapatnam reported in (2015) 10 SCC 664
paragraph 1, 2, 3, 10, 11, 15, 23 and 24 to submit that the
Policy is to be interpreted and purposive construction of
the Policy is to be given effect by this Court. He submits
that purposive interpretating has been extended even for
interpretation of tax exemption notification.
Government Of Kerala vs Mother Superior Adoration Convent on 1 March, 2021
On the same
point, another judgment is Government of Kerala and
Another v. Mother Superior Adoration Convent reported
in (2021) 5 SCC 602 paragraph 1, 4, 11, 13, 14, 15, 19,
26, 27 and 28.
The State Of Jharkhand vs Brahmputra Metallics Limited on 1 December, 2020
State of Jharkhand and Others vs Brahmputra
Metallics Limited, Ranchi reported in (2023) 10 SCC
634 paragraph 20, 23, 32, 34, 36, 38, 48, 49 and 50 to
submit that State cannot blow hot and cool at the same
time; once by extending certain benefit through the Policy
and thereby denying the benefit by inaction. He has also
submitted that the judgment elaborately deals with the
concept of promissory estoppel and legitimate
expectation and has held that two principles operate in
different fields; promissory estoppel is essentially a
shield against the action of the other side and legitimate
expectation itself can be a cause of action; once such
legitimate exception is established even in the case of
action of State in connection with private person, the
10
same assumes the status of public interest and can be
enforced.
State Of Orissa & Ors vs M/S. Tata Sponge Iron Ltd on 18 September, 2007
e) The learned counsel has relied upon the judgment passed by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Bihar and Others
v. Suprabhat Steel Ltd. and Others reported in (1999) 1 SCC 31
and submits that similar view has been taken by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the case of State of Orissa and others vs. Tata
Sponge Iron Limited reported in (2007) 8 SCC 189.
1