Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.21 seconds)
Smt. Divya Misra vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 20 December, 2022 cites

Xyz vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 14 July, 2021

10. After perusing the entire material on record including the impugned orders, I have got no hesitation to say that the impugned orders are well short of the standard set up by Hon'ble Apex Court (as mentioned above). Thus, impugned orders dated 18.4.2022 and 28.7.2021 are hereby quashed and the matter is remanded back to learned C.J.M., Meerut with a direction to re-consider and re-visit the entire matter once again and decide the same in the light of the ratio laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in aforementioned judgment, by passing a well reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 22 - M Rafiq - Full Document

Mr. Jagmohan Chhabra & Ors vs M/S. Unitech Ltd. Main Order, Per R. ... on 8 November, 2011

7. It is strenuously urged by learned counsel for the revisionist that the poor lady has been running from pillar to post to get a F.I.R. lodged but of no avail. The responsible police officers of District Meerut have paid no heed or attention to her urge to lodge a F.I.R., nor the mandatory provisions quoted above have been followed by the senior police officers and learned court below too have taken the things lightly and did not oblige her directing to lodge the F.I.R. against erring named offenders. Learned counsel for the revisionist has cited a recent judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of XYZ vs State of M.P. and others in Criminal appeal No.1184 of 2022 decided on 5.8.2022, in which the Apex Court has referred to the judgment of Constitution Bench in Lalita Kumari vs Government of Uttar Pradesh (2014) 2 SCC 1 in its paragraph 15, which reads thus :
Competition Commission of India Cites 6 - Cited by 92 - Full Document

Virender L vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 1 August, 2016

30. Finally, we wish to once again reiterate the importance of courts dealing with complainants of sexual harassment and sexual assault in a sensitive manner. It is important for all courts to remain cognizant of the fact that the legal process tends to be even more onerous for complainants who are potentially dealing with trauma and societal shame due to the unwarranted stigma attached to victims of sexual harassment and assault. At this juncture, especially in cases where the police fails to address the grievance of such complainants, the Courts have an important responsibility. As the Delhi High Court held in Virender v State of NCT of Delhi 2009, SCC OnLine Delhi, courts have to remain alive to both treating the victim sensitively while also discharging the onerous task of ensuring that the complete truth is brought on record so as to facilitate adjudication and answering the basic question regarding the complicity of the accused in the commission of the offence. In that case, the High Court held that:
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 15 - Full Document
1   2 Next