Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.50 seconds)
M/S. Varalakshmi Sugars Ltd. vs Cce, Hyderabad on 3 August, 2001 cites

M/S. J.K. Cement Works vs Cce, Jaipur on 21 May, 2001

5 . As regard Staging structural material he submitted that the benefit of Modvat Credit is admissible as held by the North Regional Bench of the Tribunal in the case of JK Cement Works vs. CCE reported in 2001 (125) ELT 480 (T). As regards Centrifugal machinery, he submitted that the machinery cannot stand without the supporting structure and they are used in relation to the manufacture of the final product. Therefore, Modvat Credit is admissible on both the items i.e. staging structural material as well as on centrifugal machinery.
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi Cites 1 - Cited by 31 - Full Document

Jawahar Mills Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Central Excise on 13 April, 1999

In this connection he submitted that wires and cables have been held to be admissible for benefit of Modvat Credit as capital goods by the larger bench in the case of Jawahar Mills vs. CCE as reported in 1999 (108) ELT 47 and also in the case of CCE Indore vs. Surya Roshini Ltd reported in 2001 (128) ELT 293 (Tri-LB) and in the case of SIV Industries Ltd vs. CCE as reported in 2001 (129) ELT 48. He has therefore prayed that the impugned order may be set aside and the appeals allowed with consequential relief.
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi Cites 16 - Cited by 111 - Full Document

Commissioner Of Customs vs Surya Roshni Ltd. on 7 January, 1999

In this connection he submitted that wires and cables have been held to be admissible for benefit of Modvat Credit as capital goods by the larger bench in the case of Jawahar Mills vs. CCE as reported in 1999 (108) ELT 47 and also in the case of CCE Indore vs. Surya Roshini Ltd reported in 2001 (128) ELT 293 (Tri-LB) and in the case of SIV Industries Ltd vs. CCE as reported in 2001 (129) ELT 48. He has therefore prayed that the impugned order may be set aside and the appeals allowed with consequential relief.
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 1 - Cited by 78 - Full Document

M/S. Siv Industries Ltd vs Commissioner Of Central Excise & ... on 10 March, 2000

In this connection he submitted that wires and cables have been held to be admissible for benefit of Modvat Credit as capital goods by the larger bench in the case of Jawahar Mills vs. CCE as reported in 1999 (108) ELT 47 and also in the case of CCE Indore vs. Surya Roshini Ltd reported in 2001 (128) ELT 293 (Tri-LB) and in the case of SIV Industries Ltd vs. CCE as reported in 2001 (129) ELT 48. He has therefore prayed that the impugned order may be set aside and the appeals allowed with consequential relief.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 116 - D P Wadhwa - Full Document
1