Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.25 seconds)

Ajmera Hng.Corp.& Anr.Etc.Etc vs Commissioner Of Income Tax on 20 August, 2010

4|Page C/10471/2020 -SM It makes it clear when even read with Section 11BB of Central Excise Act that for the payment of interest after three months from the date of receipt of refund application, the applicant shall be entitled for the interest at the rate as prescribed. The provision is nowhere expressing about "application" to be called so only in case it is supported by the requisite documents. The law has been settled that the fiscal legislation has to be construed strictly and one has to look merely at what is said in the relevant provision. There is nothing to be read in or nothing to be implied and there is no room for any intentment as it was held by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case Ajmera Housing Corporation and Other v. Commissioner of Income Tax, 2010 (8) SCC 739. If at this stage, the plea of Department is looked into still the deficiency of application does not entitle the Department to get an extension of the period of 3 months as has been statutorily provided. Further, there is a Notification as impressed upon by the appellant. Perusal thereof shows that it is a clarificatory decision specifically with respect to the refund of pre-deposit requiring such pre-deposits to be made within three months from the date of the Tribunal Orders. As mentioned in para 4 of the Circular, the word used therein is that such pre-deposit must be returned within three months rather from the date of the Order passed by the appellate Tribunal. The date of the said Order is 24-1-2017. The Department was well representing before the Tribunal for the said Appeal.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 84 - D K Jain - Full Document
1