Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.31 seconds)
Jasbir Kaur Makhni vs T.G. Buildwell Pvt. Ltd on 23 March, 2015 cites

M/S. Progressive Constructions Ltd. vs Bharat Hydro Power Corporation on 11 July, 1995

In M/s Progressive Constructions Ltd. Vs. Bharat Hydro Power Corporation Ltd. (cited supra), there was concluded contract and only the formal contract was not signed, but the parties have agreed to arbitration in their tender documents which was binding upon the parties and in those circumstances it was held that even if the contract is not signed still the arbitration clause would be binding upon the CS No. 137/14 Jasbir Kaur Makhni Vs. T.G. Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. Page 5 of 8 parties. But in the present case there is no agreement at all between the parties.
Delhi High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 28 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Jugal Kishore Rameshwardas vs Mrs. Goolbai Hormusji on 4 October, 1955

11. Similarly, a perusal of the decision in Jugal Kishore Rameshwardas Vs. Mrs. Goolbai Hormusji (cited supra) shows that it was in the context of Arbitration Act 1940. It was held in the said judgment that to constitute an arbitration agreement in writing it is not necessary that it should be signed by the parties, and it is sufficient if the terms are reduced to writing and the agreement of the parties thereto is established.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 51 - Full Document

Seth Banarsi Das vs The Cane Commissioner & Another on 6 December, 1962

Similar view has been taken by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Banarasi Das Vs. Cane Commissioner, UP & Anr. AIR 1963 SC 1417. But in the present case, as discussed herein above, the Apartment Buyer's Agreement relied upon by the defendant is not signed by either of the parties. Rather it is only a standard format agreement of the defendant in blank bereft of any details and particulars of the second party with whom the alleged agreement is entered into.
Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 25 - Full Document

M/S Harvinder Singh And Co. vs Chief Engineer (I & Fc), Govt. Of Nct Of ... on 17 September, 2012

15. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in M/s Harvinder Singh & Co. Vs. Chief Engineer (I & FC), Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr. ARBP No. 104/2012 decided on 17.09.2012 has held that Section 7 (3) of the 1996 Act makes it clear that there has to be a written arbitration agreement entered into between the parties. There could also be a written agreement signed by the parties, or exchange of documents, containing an arbitration clause.
Delhi High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 2 - S Muralidhar - Full Document
1