Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.29 seconds)
Union Of India vs Sh.Rajendra Kumar on 1 March, 2011 cites

Uoi & Ors. vs Vijender Singh & Ors. on 29 November, 2010

11. The pleas and contentions as raised by the petitioners have not been disputed and this Court is also in agreement with the reasoning of the another Bench of this Court in WP (C) 1188-90 of 2005 titled UOI & Ors. Vs Vijender Singh & ors, in order dated 29th November, 2010 where this Court has held relying on (1989) Supp 2 SCC 625, Union of India & ors Vs K.K.Vadera & ors: Baij Nath Sharma vs. Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court At Jodhpur & Anr. (1998) 7 SCC 44; State of WP(C) 2110 of 2010 Page 6 of 7 Uttaranchal & Anr. vs. Dinesh kumar Sharma (2007) 1 SCC 683 as under:
Delhi High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 27 - P Nandrajog - Full Document

The Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi ... vs The Registrar, Central Administrative ... on 23 April, 2002

8. The learned counsel for the petitioner has relied on the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench in W.P.(C) No.1188-90/2005, Union of India & Ors. v. Vijender Singh & Ors.; W.P.(C) No.1723/2010, Union of India & Anr. v. D.K.Shukla & Ors.; W.P.(C) No.1724/2010, Union of India & Anr. v. Anand Kumar Pandey & Ors.; W.P.(C) No.1725/2010, Union of India & Anr. v. CPWD Engineer Association & Ors. and W.P.(C) No.1726/2010, Union of India & Anr. v. A.K.Sharma & Ors. decided by order dated 29th November, 2010 holding that the service jurisprudence does not recognize the jurisprudential concept of deemed retrospective promotion and unless there exists a rule or there exists a residual power and in exercise of the implementation of the rule, a decision taken to grant retrospective promotion, no person can claim a right to be promoted from the date when the vacancies accrued. This Court thus, allowed the writ petition and set aside the order of the Tribunal granting retrospective promotion. The relevant observations made in these writ petitions which were allowed by this Court by order dated 29th November, 2010 are as under:-
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 398 - Full Document

State Of Uttaranchal & Anr .... ... vs Dinesh Kumar Sharma ....Respond on 4 December, 2006

11. The pleas and contentions as raised by the petitioners have not been disputed and this Court is also in agreement with the reasoning of the another Bench of this Court in WP (C) 1188-90 of 2005 titled UOI & Ors. Vs Vijender Singh & ors, in order dated 29th November, 2010 where this Court has held relying on (1989) Supp 2 SCC 625, Union of India & ors Vs K.K.Vadera & ors: Baij Nath Sharma vs. Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court At Jodhpur & Anr. (1998) 7 SCC 44; State of WP(C) 2110 of 2010 Page 6 of 7 Uttaranchal & Anr. vs. Dinesh kumar Sharma (2007) 1 SCC 683 as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 208 - A R Lakshmanan - Full Document
1