Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.21 seconds)Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 449 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 201 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Sattatiya @ Satish Rajanna Kartalla vs State Of Maharashtra on 16 January, 2008
In the matter of Sattatiya @
Satish Rajanna Kartalla Vs. State of Maharashtra, (2008) 3 SCC
210 the Supreme Court while dealing with circumstantial evidence
observed as under:
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Padala Veera Reddy vs State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others on 26 October, 1989
In Padala Veera Reddy v. State of A.P. [(1989) Supp (2)
SCC 706], this court held that when a case rests upon
circumstantial evidence, the following tests must be satisfied:
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs State Of Maharashtra on 17 July, 1984
In Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra
[(1984) 4 SCC 116], it was held that the onus was on the
prosecution to prove that the chain is complete and falsity or
untenability of the defence set up by the accused cannot be
made basis for ignoring serious infirmity or lacuna in the
prosecution case. The Court then proceeded to indicate the
conditions which must be fully established before conviction can
be based on circumstantial evidence. These are: