Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.21 seconds)

State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Nawab Hussain on 4 April, 1977

6. Above said five witnesses were the only competent witnesses who could have established identity of the accused. PW1 and PW2 are only the formal witnesses. The public witnesses did not support the prosecution case, and hence, further evidence State Vs. Nawab etc. 5 of 6 was closed because no fruitful purpose was to be served by examining the remaining witnesses. As there is no incriminating material against any of the accused, their statements u/s 313 Cr.PC were also dispensed with.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 196 - P N Shinghal - Full Document
1