Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.23 seconds)

State Of Rajasthan & Ors vs Daya Lal & Ors on 13 January, 2011

7. This Court in State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Daya Lal & Ors., AIR 2011 SC 1193, has considered the scope of regularisation of irregular or part-time appointments in all possible eventualities and laid down well-settled principles relating to regularisation and Page 4 of 14 C/SCA/5205/2014 JUDGMENT parity in pay relevant in the context of the issues involved therein. The same are as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 869 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

State Of Mysore & Anr vs S. V. Narayanappa on 22 August, 1966

"53. One aspect needs to be clarified. There may be cases where irregular appointments (not illegal appointments) as explained in State of Mysore v. S.V. Narayanappa 1967 (1) SCR 128, R.N.Nanjundappa v. T.Thimmiah 1972 (1) SCC 409 and B.N.Nagarajan v. State of Karnataka 1979 (4) SCC 507 and referred to in para 15 above, of duly qualified persons in duly sanctioned vacant posts might have been made and the employees have continued to work for ten years or more but without the intervention of orders of the courts or of tribunals. The question of regularisation of the services of such employees may have to be considered on merits in the light of the principles settled by this Court in the cases abovereferred to and in the light of this judgment. In that context, the Union of India, the State Governments and their instrumentalities should take steps to regularise as a one-time measure, the services of such irregularly appointed, who have worked for ten years or more in duly sanctioned posts but not under cover of orders of the courts or of tribunals and should further ensure that regular recruitments are undertaken to fill those vacant Page 6 of 14 C/SCA/5205/2014 JUDGMENT sanctioned posts that require to be filled up, in cases where temporary employees or daily wagers are being now employed. The process must be set in motion within six months from this date. We also clarify that regularisation, if any already made, but not sub judice, need not be reopened based on this judgment, but there should be no further bypassing of the constitutional requirement and regularising or making permanent, those not duly appointed as per the constitutional scheme." (emphasis in original)
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 455 - J M Shelat - Full Document

R. N. Nanjundappa vs T. Thimmiah & Anr on 8 December, 1971

"53. One aspect needs to be clarified. There may be cases where irregular appointments (not illegal appointments) as explained in State of Mysore v. S.V. Narayanappa 1967 (1) SCR 128, R.N.Nanjundappa v. T.Thimmiah 1972 (1) SCC 409 and B.N.Nagarajan v. State of Karnataka 1979 (4) SCC 507 and referred to in para 15 above, of duly qualified persons in duly sanctioned vacant posts might have been made and the employees have continued to work for ten years or more but without the intervention of orders of the courts or of tribunals. The question of regularisation of the services of such employees may have to be considered on merits in the light of the principles settled by this Court in the cases abovereferred to and in the light of this judgment. In that context, the Union of India, the State Governments and their instrumentalities should take steps to regularise as a one-time measure, the services of such irregularly appointed, who have worked for ten years or more in duly sanctioned posts but not under cover of orders of the courts or of tribunals and should further ensure that regular recruitments are undertaken to fill those vacant Page 6 of 14 C/SCA/5205/2014 JUDGMENT sanctioned posts that require to be filled up, in cases where temporary employees or daily wagers are being now employed. The process must be set in motion within six months from this date. We also clarify that regularisation, if any already made, but not sub judice, need not be reopened based on this judgment, but there should be no further bypassing of the constitutional requirement and regularising or making permanent, those not duly appointed as per the constitutional scheme." (emphasis in original)
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 732 - A N Ray - Full Document

B.N. Nagarajan And Ors. vs State Of Karnataka And Ors. on 3 May, 1979

"53. One aspect needs to be clarified. There may be cases where irregular appointments (not illegal appointments) as explained in State of Mysore v. S.V. Narayanappa 1967 (1) SCR 128, R.N.Nanjundappa v. T.Thimmiah 1972 (1) SCC 409 and B.N.Nagarajan v. State of Karnataka 1979 (4) SCC 507 and referred to in para 15 above, of duly qualified persons in duly sanctioned vacant posts might have been made and the employees have continued to work for ten years or more but without the intervention of orders of the courts or of tribunals. The question of regularisation of the services of such employees may have to be considered on merits in the light of the principles settled by this Court in the cases abovereferred to and in the light of this judgment. In that context, the Union of India, the State Governments and their instrumentalities should take steps to regularise as a one-time measure, the services of such irregularly appointed, who have worked for ten years or more in duly sanctioned posts but not under cover of orders of the courts or of tribunals and should further ensure that regular recruitments are undertaken to fill those vacant Page 6 of 14 C/SCA/5205/2014 JUDGMENT sanctioned posts that require to be filled up, in cases where temporary employees or daily wagers are being now employed. The process must be set in motion within six months from this date. We also clarify that regularisation, if any already made, but not sub judice, need not be reopened based on this judgment, but there should be no further bypassing of the constitutional requirement and regularising or making permanent, those not duly appointed as per the constitutional scheme." (emphasis in original)
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 218 - Full Document

Gujarat Rajya Anshkalin Karmachari ... vs State Of Gujarat & 10....Opponent(S) on 21 August, 2014

13. A Division Bench of this Court (to which I was a party) in the case of Gujarat Rajya Anshkalin Karmachari Mandal versus State of Gujarat and others, Writ Petition (PIL)No.244 of 2014, had the occasion to consider the plight of helpless Class-IV employees like the petitioners being exploited in all respects. By order dated 21.08.2014, the State Government was directed to pay all its Part Time workers at the same rate of remuneration as prescribed per day for the employment of sweeping and cleaning work. I may quote the order dated 21.08.2014 as under:-
Gujarat High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 9 - A Kureshi - Full Document
1   2 Next