Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.21 seconds)Section 28 in The Court-fees Act, 1870 [Entire Act]
The Court-fees Act, 1870
Section 54 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Indore Development Authority vs Tarak Singh & Ors. Etc.Etc on 2 May, 1995
25. The similar controversy was before Hon'ble
Apex Court in the case of Indore Development
Authority v. Tarak Singh and Others in Civil
Appeal Nos. 5645-46 of 1995, the Apex Court
considering the provision of Section 8 of Madhya
Pradesh Court Fees Act are similar to the Court Fees
Act is applicable in the State of Uttarakhand. The
Hon'ble Apex Court in paragraph has held that the
final adjudication has been made by the reference
court. Therefore, it becomes decree in view of the
Section 2 (2) of CPC and in case the appellant wish to
avoid the decree by challenging in appeal, the
appellant has to pay the ad valorem court fee.
Section 34 in The Court-fees Act, 1870 [Entire Act]
Section 23 in The Court-fees Act, 1870 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 28 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Union Of India vs Maria Olivia Carvalho And Ors. on 16 July, 1985
13. Learned counsel for the appellant initially
submitted that there was a notification by the State
Government, that the State Government and its
corporations are exempted to pay court fee, but
subsequently he fairly conceded, that despite his
sincere efforts he could not find out the said
notification of paying the court fee of Rs.10/- or state
and its corporations are exempted from payment of
court fee. Learned counsel for the appellant has
placed reliance upon the judgment of Hon'ble
Bombay High Court in the case ,Union of India vs.
Smt. Maira Olivia Carvalho & Others, AIR 1986 (1)
and submitted that court fee is not payable on
interest part. Relevant paragraph is reproduced
hereunder: