Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.21 seconds)

Indore Development Authority vs Tarak Singh & Ors. Etc.Etc on 2 May, 1995

25. The similar controversy was before Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Indore Development Authority v. Tarak Singh and Others in Civil Appeal Nos. 5645-46 of 1995, the Apex Court considering the provision of Section 8 of Madhya Pradesh Court Fees Act are similar to the Court Fees Act is applicable in the State of Uttarakhand. The Hon'ble Apex Court in paragraph has held that the final adjudication has been made by the reference court. Therefore, it becomes decree in view of the Section 2 (2) of CPC and in case the appellant wish to avoid the decree by challenging in appeal, the appellant has to pay the ad valorem court fee.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 16 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Union Of India vs Maria Olivia Carvalho And Ors. on 16 July, 1985

13. Learned counsel for the appellant initially submitted that there was a notification by the State Government, that the State Government and its corporations are exempted to pay court fee, but subsequently he fairly conceded, that despite his sincere efforts he could not find out the said notification of paying the court fee of Rs.10/- or state and its corporations are exempted from payment of court fee. Learned counsel for the appellant has placed reliance upon the judgment of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case ,Union of India vs. Smt. Maira Olivia Carvalho & Others, AIR 1986 (1) and submitted that court fee is not payable on interest part. Relevant paragraph is reproduced hereunder:
Bombay High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 7 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next