Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.17 seconds)Section 52 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Sanjay Gupta vs Smt. Kala Wati on 24 September, 1999
6. The petition is pressed to challenge the above mentioned order
on the same very contentions as were urged before the learned trial
MAC App. No. 1247/2017 Page 3 of 4
judge. Reliance is placed on decisions of learned single judges of
this court in Sanjay Gupta Vs. Smt. Kala Wati 85 (2000) DLT 828,
Prakash Khattar Vs. Shanta Jindal & Ors. 181 (2011) DLT 138
and Bhim Singh Vs. Amar Nath & Ors. 149 (2008) DLT 34 to
submit that the allotment in favour of the CRPF was in breach of
the doctrine of lis-pendens as per Section 52 of the Transfer of
Property Act, 1882. It is also argued that the impleadment of a
party against the stand taken by the plaintiff is permitted only if
there is a legal right vesting in such additional party making him a
necessary party within the meaning of the provision contained in
Order I Rule 10 CPC.
Bhim Singh vs Amar Nath And Ors. on 25 March, 2008
6. The petition is pressed to challenge the above mentioned order
on the same very contentions as were urged before the learned trial
MAC App. No. 1247/2017 Page 3 of 4
judge. Reliance is placed on decisions of learned single judges of
this court in Sanjay Gupta Vs. Smt. Kala Wati 85 (2000) DLT 828,
Prakash Khattar Vs. Shanta Jindal & Ors. 181 (2011) DLT 138
and Bhim Singh Vs. Amar Nath & Ors. 149 (2008) DLT 34 to
submit that the allotment in favour of the CRPF was in breach of
the doctrine of lis-pendens as per Section 52 of the Transfer of
Property Act, 1882. It is also argued that the impleadment of a
party against the stand taken by the plaintiff is permitted only if
there is a legal right vesting in such additional party making him a
necessary party within the meaning of the provision contained in
Order I Rule 10 CPC.
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Prakash Khattar vs Smt. Shanta Jindal & Ors. on 4 July, 2011
6. The petition is pressed to challenge the above mentioned order
on the same very contentions as were urged before the learned trial
MAC App. No. 1247/2017 Page 3 of 4
judge. Reliance is placed on decisions of learned single judges of
this court in Sanjay Gupta Vs. Smt. Kala Wati 85 (2000) DLT 828,
Prakash Khattar Vs. Shanta Jindal & Ors. 181 (2011) DLT 138
and Bhim Singh Vs. Amar Nath & Ors. 149 (2008) DLT 34 to
submit that the allotment in favour of the CRPF was in breach of
the doctrine of lis-pendens as per Section 52 of the Transfer of
Property Act, 1882. It is also argued that the impleadment of a
party against the stand taken by the plaintiff is permitted only if
there is a legal right vesting in such additional party making him a
necessary party within the meaning of the provision contained in
Order I Rule 10 CPC.
1