Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (1.30 seconds)
S. Arumuganainar Senior Manager ... vs Jeenath Roadways, Represented By Its ... on 24 August, 2005
cites
The Contempt Of Courts Act, 1971
Section 4 in The Contempt Of Courts Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in The Contempt Of Courts Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 9 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Vidya Charan Shukla vs Tamil Nadu Olympic Association And ... on 3 January, 1991
"We are in entire agreement with the above view expressed by the Division Bench of this Court in Vidya Charan Shukla v. Tamil Nadu Olympic Association and Anr. (C.A.No.5 of 1990 and Letters Patent Appeal No.123 of 1990). Inasmuch as by the order under appeal, the learned Single Judge has declared that the first respondent is entitled to quarry sand in the area in question for a period of 3 months and directed respondents 2 to 4 to permit the first respondent, to quarry sand for a period of 3 months from 1.5.1993. we are inclined to hold that such an order is a 'Judgment' for the purpose of clause 15 of the Letters Patent and that the order under appeal satisfies the conditions prescribed in Clause 15 of the Letters Patent. In these circumstances, we have no hesitation in holding that the present appeal is maintainable under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent."