Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.24 seconds)
State Of Chhattisgarh vs Smt. Sweta Singh on 19 September, 2022 cites

Canara Bank & Anr vs M. Mahesh Kumar on 15 May, 2015

16. A two judges bench headed by Justice Uday U. Lalit noticed the Supreme Court's view in State Bank of India v. Raj Kumar, (supra) and MGB Gramin Bank v. Chakrawarti Singh, (supra) on 12 one side and the contrary view in Canara Bank v. M. Mahesh Kumar (supra) and felt the necessity of resolution of the conflicting question on whether the norms applicable on the date of death or on the date of consideration of application should apply.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 709 - R Banumathi - Full Document

State Bank Of India vs Sheo Shankar Tewari on 8 February, 2019

67. It is seen that with regard to the question as to whether the Policy in force on the date of death of the government employee is to be applied or the Policy at the time of consideration of the application for compassionate appointment is to be considered, there is a divergence of opinion. It is already noticed that a reference was already made in Sheo Shankar Tewai (supra) for consideration of this issue by at least a Bench of minimum three Hon'ble Judges. It is to be noticed that a three Judge Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court had taken a view that it is the scheme that is holding the field on the date of consideration has to be applied.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 82 - U U Lalit - Full Document

Mgb Gramin Bank vs Chakrawarti Singh on 7 August, 2013

16. A two judges bench headed by Justice Uday U. Lalit noticed the Supreme Court's view in State Bank of India v. Raj Kumar, (supra) and MGB Gramin Bank v. Chakrawarti Singh, (supra) on 12 one side and the contrary view in Canara Bank v. M. Mahesh Kumar (supra) and felt the necessity of resolution of the conflicting question on whether the norms applicable on the date of death or on the date of consideration of application should apply.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 853 - Full Document

State Bank Of India & Anr vs Raj Kumar on 8 February, 2010

16. A two judges bench headed by Justice Uday U. Lalit noticed the Supreme Court's view in State Bank of India v. Raj Kumar, (supra) and MGB Gramin Bank v. Chakrawarti Singh, (supra) on 12 one side and the contrary view in Canara Bank v. M. Mahesh Kumar (supra) and felt the necessity of resolution of the conflicting question on whether the norms applicable on the date of death or on the date of consideration of application should apply.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 861 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

The Secretary To Govt. Department Of ... vs Bheemesh Alias Bheemappa on 16 December, 2021

After noticing the judgment in N.C. Santosh (supra) delivered by a three-Judge Bench, a two-Judge Bench in Bheemesh alias Bheemappa (supra) had noted that the Policy which was in force on the date of death of the government employee should be the basis for consideration of a claim for compassionate appointment. It was highlighted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the aforesaid case that where the benefit under the existing Policy was taken away or substituted with a lesser benefit, the Court directed the application of the new Policy, and in cases where the benefits under an existing Policy were enlarged by a modified Policy after 17 the death of the employee, the Court applied only the Policy that was in force on the date of death of the employee. The same was also explained to the effect that such interpretation was fundamentally due to the fact that compassionate appointment was always considered to be an exception to the normal method of recruitment and perhaps looked down upon with lesser compassion for the individual and greater concern for the rule of law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 118 - V Ramasubramanian - Full Document

State Bank Of India & Ors. .... ... vs Aspal Kaur ...Respondent(S) on 1 February, 2007

In State Bank of India and Others v. Sheo Shankar Tewari , reported in (2019) 5 SCC 600, noticing the divergent principles emanating from the two lines of decisions, namely, Raj Kumar (supra) and Chakrawarti Singh (supra) on the one hand and M. Mahesh Kumar (supra) and Jaspal Kaur (supra) on the other hand, rendered by the Benches of two Hon'ble Judges, it was observed that the matter requires consideration by a larger Bench of at least three Hon'ble Judges of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 362 - A R Lakshmanan - Full Document
1   2 Next