Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.41 seconds)

Daulat Ram vs State Of Punjab on 29 April, 1997

15. Section 195 Cr.P.C. bars the court from taking cognizance in some cases i.e., offences punishable under Sections 172 to 188 IPC (both inclusive) or its abetment or attempt, or criminal conspiracy, except on the complaint in writing of the public servant concerned, or his superiors. It is settled law that in the absence of the complaint, taking of cognizance is bad and such taking of cognizance has been quashed by the High Courts and the Apex Court. The judgments relied upon by the learned counsel for petitioner, namely, Bajranglal Parikh (supra), Gurinder Singh (supra), Apurva Ghiy (supra), Sushil Sharma (supra), Saloni Arora (supra), Daulat Ram (supra) and Mohan Kukreja (supra), are all cases that have set aside orders whereby cognizance was taken by the court in the absence Signature Not Verified W.P.(CRL) 698/2022 Page 6 of 11 Digitally Signed By:MANJEET KAUR Signing Date:04.08.2022 16:34:15 of a complaint of the concerned public servant.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 94 - Full Document
1   2 Next