Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 23 (0.25 seconds)
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Industrial Cables (India) Ltd. on 21 December, 2006 cites

Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs H.R. Sugar Factory Pvt. Ltd. on 31 July, 1990

Learned Counsel for the Revenue pointed out that subsequently, this Court had examined the matter in great detail in its judgment in CIT v. Abhishek Industries Ltd. and after noticing different view points on the issue, respectfully disagreed with the view taken by Delhi High Court in CIT v. Tin Box Co. and CIT v. Orissa Cement Ltd. , Allahabad High Court in CIT v. Radico Khaitan Ltd. and CIT v. Prem Heavy Engineering Works (P) Ltd. (2006) 150 Taxman 90 (All), Calcutta High Court in CIT v. Britannia Industries Ltd. High Court in R.D. Joshi & Co. v. CIT and inter alia concurred with the view taken by Madras High Court in K. Somasundaram & Brothers v. CIT v. M.S. Venkateswaran and CIT v. P. Ganu Rao & Sons , Kerala High Court in CIT v. V.I. Baby & Co. , Delhi High Court in CIT v. Motor General Finance Ltd. (2002) 173 CTR (Del) 123 : (2002) 254 ITR 449 (Del), Allahabad High Court in CIT v. H.R. Sugar Factory (P) Ltd. and CIT v. H.R. Sugar Factory (1991) 190 ITR 643 (All), Orissa High Court in Indian Metals & Ferro Alloys Ltd. v. CIT (1992) 193 ITR 344 (Ori) and this High Court in S.A. Builders Ltd. v. CIT and Anr. . It was held:
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 117 - B P Reddy - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income Tax-I vs Abhishek Industries Ltd. on 4 August, 2006

Learned Counsel for the Revenue pointed out that subsequently, this Court had examined the matter in great detail in its judgment in CIT v. Abhishek Industries Ltd. and after noticing different view points on the issue, respectfully disagreed with the view taken by Delhi High Court in CIT v. Tin Box Co. and CIT v. Orissa Cement Ltd. , Allahabad High Court in CIT v. Radico Khaitan Ltd. and CIT v. Prem Heavy Engineering Works (P) Ltd. (2006) 150 Taxman 90 (All), Calcutta High Court in CIT v. Britannia Industries Ltd. High Court in R.D. Joshi & Co. v. CIT and inter alia concurred with the view taken by Madras High Court in K. Somasundaram & Brothers v. CIT v. M.S. Venkateswaran and CIT v. P. Ganu Rao & Sons , Kerala High Court in CIT v. V.I. Baby & Co. , Delhi High Court in CIT v. Motor General Finance Ltd. (2002) 173 CTR (Del) 123 : (2002) 254 ITR 449 (Del), Allahabad High Court in CIT v. H.R. Sugar Factory (P) Ltd. and CIT v. H.R. Sugar Factory (1991) 190 ITR 643 (All), Orissa High Court in Indian Metals & Ferro Alloys Ltd. v. CIT (1992) 193 ITR 344 (Ori) and this High Court in S.A. Builders Ltd. v. CIT and Anr. . It was held:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 67 - Cited by 376 - R Bindal - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Tin Box Co. on 13 November, 2002

Learned Counsel for the Revenue pointed out that subsequently, this Court had examined the matter in great detail in its judgment in CIT v. Abhishek Industries Ltd. and after noticing different view points on the issue, respectfully disagreed with the view taken by Delhi High Court in CIT v. Tin Box Co. and CIT v. Orissa Cement Ltd. , Allahabad High Court in CIT v. Radico Khaitan Ltd. and CIT v. Prem Heavy Engineering Works (P) Ltd. (2006) 150 Taxman 90 (All), Calcutta High Court in CIT v. Britannia Industries Ltd. High Court in R.D. Joshi & Co. v. CIT and inter alia concurred with the view taken by Madras High Court in K. Somasundaram & Brothers v. CIT v. M.S. Venkateswaran and CIT v. P. Ganu Rao & Sons , Kerala High Court in CIT v. V.I. Baby & Co. , Delhi High Court in CIT v. Motor General Finance Ltd. (2002) 173 CTR (Del) 123 : (2002) 254 ITR 449 (Del), Allahabad High Court in CIT v. H.R. Sugar Factory (P) Ltd. and CIT v. H.R. Sugar Factory (1991) 190 ITR 643 (All), Orissa High Court in Indian Metals & Ferro Alloys Ltd. v. CIT (1992) 193 ITR 344 (Ori) and this High Court in S.A. Builders Ltd. v. CIT and Anr. . It was held:
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 94 - D K Jain - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Delhi ... vs Orissa Cement Ltd. on 14 February, 1980

Learned Counsel for the Revenue pointed out that subsequently, this Court had examined the matter in great detail in its judgment in CIT v. Abhishek Industries Ltd. and after noticing different view points on the issue, respectfully disagreed with the view taken by Delhi High Court in CIT v. Tin Box Co. and CIT v. Orissa Cement Ltd. , Allahabad High Court in CIT v. Radico Khaitan Ltd. and CIT v. Prem Heavy Engineering Works (P) Ltd. (2006) 150 Taxman 90 (All), Calcutta High Court in CIT v. Britannia Industries Ltd. High Court in R.D. Joshi & Co. v. CIT and inter alia concurred with the view taken by Madras High Court in K. Somasundaram & Brothers v. CIT v. M.S. Venkateswaran and CIT v. P. Ganu Rao & Sons , Kerala High Court in CIT v. V.I. Baby & Co. , Delhi High Court in CIT v. Motor General Finance Ltd. (2002) 173 CTR (Del) 123 : (2002) 254 ITR 449 (Del), Allahabad High Court in CIT v. H.R. Sugar Factory (P) Ltd. and CIT v. H.R. Sugar Factory (1991) 190 ITR 643 (All), Orissa High Court in Indian Metals & Ferro Alloys Ltd. v. CIT (1992) 193 ITR 344 (Ori) and this High Court in S.A. Builders Ltd. v. CIT and Anr. . It was held:
Delhi High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 63 - S Ranganathan - Full Document

Cit vs Radico Khaitan Ltd. on 14 September, 2004

Learned Counsel for the Revenue pointed out that subsequently, this Court had examined the matter in great detail in its judgment in CIT v. Abhishek Industries Ltd. and after noticing different view points on the issue, respectfully disagreed with the view taken by Delhi High Court in CIT v. Tin Box Co. and CIT v. Orissa Cement Ltd. , Allahabad High Court in CIT v. Radico Khaitan Ltd. and CIT v. Prem Heavy Engineering Works (P) Ltd. (2006) 150 Taxman 90 (All), Calcutta High Court in CIT v. Britannia Industries Ltd. High Court in R.D. Joshi & Co. v. CIT and inter alia concurred with the view taken by Madras High Court in K. Somasundaram & Brothers v. CIT v. M.S. Venkateswaran and CIT v. P. Ganu Rao & Sons , Kerala High Court in CIT v. V.I. Baby & Co. , Delhi High Court in CIT v. Motor General Finance Ltd. (2002) 173 CTR (Del) 123 : (2002) 254 ITR 449 (Del), Allahabad High Court in CIT v. H.R. Sugar Factory (P) Ltd. and CIT v. H.R. Sugar Factory (1991) 190 ITR 643 (All), Orissa High Court in Indian Metals & Ferro Alloys Ltd. v. CIT (1992) 193 ITR 344 (Ori) and this High Court in S.A. Builders Ltd. v. CIT and Anr. . It was held:
Allahabad High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 55 - R K Agrawal - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Prem Heavy Engineering Works P. Ltd. on 25 April, 2005

Learned Counsel for the Revenue pointed out that subsequently, this Court had examined the matter in great detail in its judgment in CIT v. Abhishek Industries Ltd. and after noticing different view points on the issue, respectfully disagreed with the view taken by Delhi High Court in CIT v. Tin Box Co. and CIT v. Orissa Cement Ltd. , Allahabad High Court in CIT v. Radico Khaitan Ltd. and CIT v. Prem Heavy Engineering Works (P) Ltd. (2006) 150 Taxman 90 (All), Calcutta High Court in CIT v. Britannia Industries Ltd. High Court in R.D. Joshi & Co. v. CIT and inter alia concurred with the view taken by Madras High Court in K. Somasundaram & Brothers v. CIT v. M.S. Venkateswaran and CIT v. P. Ganu Rao & Sons , Kerala High Court in CIT v. V.I. Baby & Co. , Delhi High Court in CIT v. Motor General Finance Ltd. (2002) 173 CTR (Del) 123 : (2002) 254 ITR 449 (Del), Allahabad High Court in CIT v. H.R. Sugar Factory (P) Ltd. and CIT v. H.R. Sugar Factory (1991) 190 ITR 643 (All), Orissa High Court in Indian Metals & Ferro Alloys Ltd. v. CIT (1992) 193 ITR 344 (Ori) and this High Court in S.A. Builders Ltd. v. CIT and Anr. . It was held:
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 35 - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Britannia Industries Ltd. on 30 June, 2005

Learned Counsel for the Revenue pointed out that subsequently, this Court had examined the matter in great detail in its judgment in CIT v. Abhishek Industries Ltd. and after noticing different view points on the issue, respectfully disagreed with the view taken by Delhi High Court in CIT v. Tin Box Co. and CIT v. Orissa Cement Ltd. , Allahabad High Court in CIT v. Radico Khaitan Ltd. and CIT v. Prem Heavy Engineering Works (P) Ltd. (2006) 150 Taxman 90 (All), Calcutta High Court in CIT v. Britannia Industries Ltd. High Court in R.D. Joshi & Co. v. CIT and inter alia concurred with the view taken by Madras High Court in K. Somasundaram & Brothers v. CIT v. M.S. Venkateswaran and CIT v. P. Ganu Rao & Sons , Kerala High Court in CIT v. V.I. Baby & Co. , Delhi High Court in CIT v. Motor General Finance Ltd. (2002) 173 CTR (Del) 123 : (2002) 254 ITR 449 (Del), Allahabad High Court in CIT v. H.R. Sugar Factory (P) Ltd. and CIT v. H.R. Sugar Factory (1991) 190 ITR 643 (All), Orissa High Court in Indian Metals & Ferro Alloys Ltd. v. CIT (1992) 193 ITR 344 (Ori) and this High Court in S.A. Builders Ltd. v. CIT and Anr. . It was held:
Calcutta High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 73 - D K Seth - Full Document

R.D. Joshi And Co. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 10 April, 2001

Learned Counsel for the Revenue pointed out that subsequently, this Court had examined the matter in great detail in its judgment in CIT v. Abhishek Industries Ltd. and after noticing different view points on the issue, respectfully disagreed with the view taken by Delhi High Court in CIT v. Tin Box Co. and CIT v. Orissa Cement Ltd. , Allahabad High Court in CIT v. Radico Khaitan Ltd. and CIT v. Prem Heavy Engineering Works (P) Ltd. (2006) 150 Taxman 90 (All), Calcutta High Court in CIT v. Britannia Industries Ltd. High Court in R.D. Joshi & Co. v. CIT and inter alia concurred with the view taken by Madras High Court in K. Somasundaram & Brothers v. CIT v. M.S. Venkateswaran and CIT v. P. Ganu Rao & Sons , Kerala High Court in CIT v. V.I. Baby & Co. , Delhi High Court in CIT v. Motor General Finance Ltd. (2002) 173 CTR (Del) 123 : (2002) 254 ITR 449 (Del), Allahabad High Court in CIT v. H.R. Sugar Factory (P) Ltd. and CIT v. H.R. Sugar Factory (1991) 190 ITR 643 (All), Orissa High Court in Indian Metals & Ferro Alloys Ltd. v. CIT (1992) 193 ITR 344 (Ori) and this High Court in S.A. Builders Ltd. v. CIT and Anr. . It was held:
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 21 - J G Chitre - Full Document

K. Somasundaram And Brothers vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 3 August, 1998

Learned Counsel for the Revenue pointed out that subsequently, this Court had examined the matter in great detail in its judgment in CIT v. Abhishek Industries Ltd. and after noticing different view points on the issue, respectfully disagreed with the view taken by Delhi High Court in CIT v. Tin Box Co. and CIT v. Orissa Cement Ltd. , Allahabad High Court in CIT v. Radico Khaitan Ltd. and CIT v. Prem Heavy Engineering Works (P) Ltd. (2006) 150 Taxman 90 (All), Calcutta High Court in CIT v. Britannia Industries Ltd. High Court in R.D. Joshi & Co. v. CIT and inter alia concurred with the view taken by Madras High Court in K. Somasundaram & Brothers v. CIT v. M.S. Venkateswaran and CIT v. P. Ganu Rao & Sons , Kerala High Court in CIT v. V.I. Baby & Co. , Delhi High Court in CIT v. Motor General Finance Ltd. (2002) 173 CTR (Del) 123 : (2002) 254 ITR 449 (Del), Allahabad High Court in CIT v. H.R. Sugar Factory (P) Ltd. and CIT v. H.R. Sugar Factory (1991) 190 ITR 643 (All), Orissa High Court in Indian Metals & Ferro Alloys Ltd. v. CIT (1992) 193 ITR 344 (Ori) and this High Court in S.A. Builders Ltd. v. CIT and Anr. . It was held:
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 52 - R J Babu - Full Document
1   2 3 Next