Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.22 seconds)

The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Laxmi Narayan on 5 March, 2019

10. Considering the fact as well as on perusal of record, it appears that no heinous and serious offences of mental depravity or other offences, which may affect the society in general, are made out and both the parties have amicably settled their dispute through compromise which has been duly verified by the court below as well as in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Another; (2012) 10 SCC 303, Narinder Singh & Others vs. State of Punjab & Another (2014) 6 SCC 477, State of M.P. Vs. Laxmi Narayan, (2019) 5 SCC 688 and State of M.P. vs. Dhruv Gurjar, AIR 2017 SC 1106, the entire proceedings including the impugned charge-sheet dated 13.04.2018 as well as impugned cognizance/summoning order dated 28.05.2018 passed by learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate- VIII, Kanpur Nagar in Case No. 26049 of 2018 (State Vs. Shiv Kumar Saini & others) arising out of Crime No. 276 of 2017 u/s 498-A, 323 I.P.C., and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Police Station- Nawabganj, District- Kanpur Nagar, pending in the court of learned Additional Civil Judge (S.D.)- 05, Kanpur Nagar, are hereby quashed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 4366 - M R Shah - Full Document

Gian Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 24 September, 2012

10. Considering the fact as well as on perusal of record, it appears that no heinous and serious offences of mental depravity or other offences, which may affect the society in general, are made out and both the parties have amicably settled their dispute through compromise which has been duly verified by the court below as well as in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Another; (2012) 10 SCC 303, Narinder Singh & Others vs. State of Punjab & Another (2014) 6 SCC 477, State of M.P. Vs. Laxmi Narayan, (2019) 5 SCC 688 and State of M.P. vs. Dhruv Gurjar, AIR 2017 SC 1106, the entire proceedings including the impugned charge-sheet dated 13.04.2018 as well as impugned cognizance/summoning order dated 28.05.2018 passed by learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate- VIII, Kanpur Nagar in Case No. 26049 of 2018 (State Vs. Shiv Kumar Saini & others) arising out of Crime No. 276 of 2017 u/s 498-A, 323 I.P.C., and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Police Station- Nawabganj, District- Kanpur Nagar, pending in the court of learned Additional Civil Judge (S.D.)- 05, Kanpur Nagar, are hereby quashed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 81 - Cited by 53834 - R M Lodha - Full Document

State Of Chhattisgarh vs Lokendra Puri 6 Crmp/652/2019 Rajendra ... on 14 March, 2019

10. Considering the fact as well as on perusal of record, it appears that no heinous and serious offences of mental depravity or other offences, which may affect the society in general, are made out and both the parties have amicably settled their dispute through compromise which has been duly verified by the court below as well as in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Another; (2012) 10 SCC 303, Narinder Singh & Others vs. State of Punjab & Another (2014) 6 SCC 477, State of M.P. Vs. Laxmi Narayan, (2019) 5 SCC 688 and State of M.P. vs. Dhruv Gurjar, AIR 2017 SC 1106, the entire proceedings including the impugned charge-sheet dated 13.04.2018 as well as impugned cognizance/summoning order dated 28.05.2018 passed by learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate- VIII, Kanpur Nagar in Case No. 26049 of 2018 (State Vs. Shiv Kumar Saini & others) arising out of Crime No. 276 of 2017 u/s 498-A, 323 I.P.C., and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Police Station- Nawabganj, District- Kanpur Nagar, pending in the court of learned Additional Civil Judge (S.D.)- 05, Kanpur Nagar, are hereby quashed.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 35 - R P Sharma - Full Document
1   2 Next