Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.24 seconds)
Mool Chand vs State Of U.P. on 10 February, 2006 cites

State vs Zilla Singh on 5 January, 1973

In the case of Zilla Singh (supra) the prayer of the prosecution was to permit its witnesses P.Ws. 18 and 19 to depose after seeing the photographs whether they reccognized the persons in those photographs or not. Now it is to be seen that it was a matter of oral evidence as to whether they recognised those photographs of the deceased or not, and grant of such a permission to produce such an oral evidence amounted to permission to the prosecution to fill up lacuna. But in the present case this fact is to be ascertained from documentary evidence of independent departments of the Government i.e. the C.M.O. and the post office as to whether the report was sent to the accused or not, and this order does not amount to permission to fill up lacuna in the prosecution evidence. Learned Addl. Sessions Judge committed no illegality nor error while granting this permission. The order passed by him does not suffer from any illegality. The revision, in this way, has got no force and is liable to be dismissed.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 2 - J Singh - Full Document
1